Registry pointed out a typographical error in an earlier order granting anticipatory bail, which had recorded the bail application as dismissed. The court directed that para 12 of the order dated 02.02.2026 read as 'The bail application is disposed of'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~88
JANAK KUMAR NAVINCHANDRA SOLANKI .....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
THE STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State.
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA O R D E R % 03.02.2026
DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
FEBRUARY 03, 2026/A
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/02/2026 at 12:22:52
1 issue framed by the court
Whether para 12 of the order dated 02.02.2026 should be corrected to record that the anticipatory bail application was disposed of rather than dismissed?
Janak Kumar Navinchandra Solanki
The State of NCT Delhi & Ors.
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
