Rakhib Miah Vs State Govt.of N.C.T. Delhi

By virtue of the present bail application under Section 483 read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( BNSS ), the applicant seeks regular bail in proceedings arising from FIR No.220/2025 dated 10.06.2025 registered at PS.: Dwarka North, New Delhi under Sections 8/20/29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ( NDPS ).

¶10

Based on the contents of the FIR, the applicant and co-accused, Manju Hussain were found having 14.483 Kgs and 14.298 Kgs of ‘ Ganja ’ respectively inside their respective bags.

¶11

Learned counsel for the applicant seeks grant of regular bail as the applicant is a young boy of 24 years with clean antecedents, and since he is in judicial custody since 10.06.2025 i.e. about eight months . Moreover, since 14.483 Kgs of ‘ Ganja ’ recovered from the possession of the applicant which is an intermediate quantity, the rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act will not be applicable. In support, she relies upon Muthu

¶12

BAIL APPLN. 3152/2025

¶13

Page 1 of 4

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 13:02:27

¶16

Kumar v. Station House Officer, Kottakkal Police Stn., 2008 SCC OnLine Ker 100 , Sunil vs. The State of NCT of Delhi (Bail Appln.495/2022) , Smt. Sachala Nauak vs. State of NCT of Delhi (Bail Appln.3351/2021) and Anita vs. State of NCT of Delhi (Bail Appln.1538/2022) .

¶17

Per contra , learned APP for the State relying upon the Status Report submits that since a total of 28.781 Kgs of ‘ Ganja ’ was recovered from the possession of the applicant and the co-accused, the recovery is of a commercial quantity and the rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are attracted, more so since both the accused were apprehended together from the same spot. Even otherwise, the chargesheet has already been filed on 05.12.2025.

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as also the learned APP for the State and perused the documents as also the Status Report on record and also gone through the judgments cited at the Bar.

¶19

For the purposes of rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act to be attracted, what has to be seen is the quantum recovered from the applicant de hors of any other quantum recovered from any other co-accused, be it at the same time or at the same spot. The said issue has been settled long back by a Division Bench of the Kerala High Court in Muthu Kumar (supra) wherein it has been held as under:-

¶20

“6. As far as this application is concerned, we are of the opinion that the question is mere academic. The applicants herein were charge-sheeted for offences punishable under section 20(b)(ii)(C). The allegations in the charge sheet prima facie show that out of the total quantity of 31.150 k.grams of ganja, the 1st accused was found carrying 15 kg. and 50 grams folded in his waste, the 2nd accused was found

¶21

Page 2 of 4

¶22

BAIL APPLN. 3152/2025

¶23

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 13:02:27

¶24

in carrying 6 kgms. in a bag and 5 kgm in a suit case and 50 grams in his waste and 3rd accused was carrying 5 kg. and 50 grams in his waste. If that be so, even though total quantity as above is a commercial quantity, each of the accused was in possession of only a lesser than the commercial quantity. If the accused were not in possession of the commercial quantity, Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act will not apply. It is reported that the accused were in prison from 26-10-2007 and thy had undergone 167 days imprisonment and the charge sheet was already filed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that this is a fit case for granting bail on stringent conditions..”

¶25

In fact, this Court has also followed the same view in Smt. Sachala Nauak (supra) , Anita as also in Sunil (supra) .

¶26

Thus, since it is an admitted case herein that only an intermediate quantity of 14.483 Kgs of ‘ Ganja ’ was recovered from the applicant, it is clear that the case of the applicant does not fall within the rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

¶27

Also, since the applicant herein is a young boy of 24 years with no prior antecedents and although the charge sheet has already been filed before the learned Trial Court, charges are yet to be framed and thus trial yet to commence, further judicial custody and/ or interrogation of the applicant for a prolonged period may not be necessary. More so, the applicant is facing incarceration since past eight months .

¶28

As such, in view of the aforesaid factors, the applicant is granted regular bail in FIR No.220/2025 dated 10.06.2025 registered at PS.: Dwarka North, New Delhi under Sections 8/20/29 of the NDPS Act subject to him furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/( Rupees Fifty Thousand Only ) along with one surety of the like amount by

¶29

BAIL APPLN. 3152/2025

¶30

Page 3 of 4

¶31

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 13:02:27

¶32

a family member/ friend having no criminal case pending against him and further subject to satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, as also subject to the following conditions:-

¶33

a. Applicant shall not leave NCT of Delhi without prior permission of the concerned Court and shall ordinarily reside at the address as per TCR.

¶34

b. Applicant shall surrender his Passport, if any, to the IO within three days of his release.

¶35

c. Applicant shall join and participate in the investigation as and when called by the IO.

¶36

d. Applicant shall provide all his mobile numbers to the IO concerned which shall be kept in working condition at all times.

¶37

e. Applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not contact any of the prosecution witnesses, or tamper with the evidence of the case.

¶38

Accordingly, the present application is allowed and disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶39

A copy of this order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary information and compliance thereof.

¶40

Needless to say, since the expressions of opinion, if any, are for the purposes of adjudicating the present application only, they shall have no bearing on the overall merits/ trial involved in the matter.

¶41

SAURABH BANERJEE, J.

¶42

FEBRUARY 26, 2026/So/DA

¶43

Page 4 of 4

¶44

BAIL APPLN. 3152/2025

¶45

This is a digitally signed order.

¶46

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 13:02:27

Rakhib Miah v. State Govt.of N.C.T. Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakhib Miah v. State Govt.of N.C.T. Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Faisal Alam @ Sharukh@Mota Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Aakash Khokhar Vs State NCT of Delhi

Gaurav Arora Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Md. Jaseem Vs State of N.C.T. of Delhi

Vijeta Gautam Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Gaurav Godara Vs the State of NCT of Delhi through Its Station House Officer Police Station Indira Gandhi Internatio