Dismissed¶11

Vishnu Tiwari v. the State Govt. Ofnct of Delhi

Delhi HC13 Jul 2026BAIL APPLN./2636/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Vishnu Tiwari v. State (NCT of Delhi), BAIL APPLN. 2636/2026 & CRL.M.A. 20082/2026, Delhi High Court, Prateek Jalan J, order dated 13.07.2026. Regular bail under S. 483 BNSS 2023 sought in FIR No. 207/2024 dated 28.03.2024, PS New Ashok Nagar, District East, Delhi, under Ss. 376/506 IPC 1860 read with Ss. 4/6 POCSO Act 2012. Application withdrawn by counsel and dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to approach Trial Court for expeditious disposal per its Board and age of pending matters; no comment on merits. No precedent discussed.

What did the court decide?

No bail granted; application dismissed as withdrawn. Applicant given liberty to move the Trial Court for expeditious conclusion of proceedings, to be considered per the Trial Court's own Board and the age of pending matters; no comment made on merits. ¶11

Vishnu Tiwari Vs the State Govt. Ofnct of Delhi — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Delhi HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶11

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant should be granted regular bail under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 in connection with FIR No. 207/2024 (Sections 376/506 IPC read with Sections 4/6 POCSO Act).

¶9

Court's answer

The Court permitted the applicant's counsel, after some arguments, to withdraw the bail application.

¶10

Ratio / Principle

The applicant is at liberty to move the Trial Court for expeditious conclusion of the proceedings, which may be considered by the Trial Court in accordance with its own Board and the age of matters pending before it.

¶10

Key takeaways

The Court expressly made no comment on the merits of the case or on any proposed application before the Trial Court.ratio¶15
The bail application, alongwith the pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the above.ratio¶11

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Delhi High Court (Prateek Jalan, J.), Order dated 13.07.2026 in BAIL APPLN. 2636/2026 & CRL.M.A. 20082/2026: Vishnu Tiwari sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with FIR No. 207/2024 dated 28.03.2024, PS New Ashok Nagar, District East, Delhi (Sections 376/506 IPC, 1860 read with Sections 4/6 POCSO Act, 2012). After some arguments, counsel Ms. Sonali Tiwary sought leave to withdraw; the Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the bail application and pending application as withdrawn, while granting the applicant liberty to move the Trial Court for expeditious conclusion of proceedings, to be considered in accordance with the Trial Court's own Board and the age of matters pending before it. The Court expressly stated it had made no comment on the merits of the case or on any proposed application before the Trial Court.

¶1

$~89

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 2636/2026 & CRL.M.A. 20082/2026

¶4

VISHNU TIWARI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sonali Tiwary, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

THE STATE GOVT. OFNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP with SI Ritika Choudhary.

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R

¶8

% 13.07.2026

¶9

By way of this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 207/2024 dated 28.03.2024, registered at Police Station New Ashok Nagar, District East, Delhi, under Sections 376/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, read with Sections 4/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

¶10

After some arguments, Ms. Sonali Tiwary, learned counsel for the applicant, seeks permission to withdraw this application. However, she seeks directions for expeditious conclusion of the proceedings before the Trial Court. The applicant is at liberty to move the Trial Court in this regard, which may consider the same in accordance with its own Board and the age of matters pending before it.

¶11

The bail application, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the above.

¶12

BAIL APPLN. 2636/2026

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2026 at 11:34:36

¶15

It is made clear that this Court has not made any comment on the merits of the case or on any proposed application before the Trial Court, which may be considered by the Trial Court in accordance with law.

¶16

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶17

JULY 13, 2026 tg/KA/

¶18

BAIL APPLN. 2636/2026

¶19

Page 2 of 2

¶20

Vishnu Tiwari v. the State Govt. Ofnct of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishnu Tiwari v. the State Govt. Ofnct of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Kumar and Anr. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Surjeet Singh Vs Jain Co-Operative Bank Ltd.

Nazir Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Pankaj Wadhwa Vs Anil Kumar Wadhwa

Sh Kamran Khan Vs State NCT of Delhi

Purshottam Sharma and Another Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.