Applicant sought anticipatory bail for an alleged stabbing under BNS 2023 Section 118(1)/3(5). CCTV footage confirmed his presence at the scene and his address verification suggested mala fide conduct; custodial interrogation was deemed necessary to recover the weapon.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66
Through: Mr. R.K.L. Chaudhary, Advocate versus THE STATE GOVT.N.C.T. OF DELHI .....Respondent
Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for State SI Mukesh Kumar, PS Khyala, Delhi
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
CRL.M.A. 15864/2026 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
BAIL APPLN. 1949/2026
BAIL APPLN. 1949/2026 1
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2026 at 12:09:54
MANOJ JAIN, J
MAY 18, 2026/ dr/pb
BAIL APPLN. 1949/2026 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2026 at 12:09:54
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant named in an attempted murder FIR given CCTV evidence and doubtful conduct.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sajeb
The State Govt. N.C.T. of Delhi
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
