Anticipatory bail application in a forgery case; original documents allegedly withheld from the IO. Counsel, on instructions, sought withdrawal to surrender and apply for regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~63
Through: Counsel for petitioner ( appearance not given ).
versus
STATE OF NCT DELHI THOURGH SHO PS M S PARK DELHI
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Sandeep Kumar, PS M. S. Park.
Mr. Dinesh Malik and Mr. Puneet Jain, Advocates for complainant with complainant in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R % 06.05.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 11:40:08
Park and was assigned DD No. 72A, which would show that the accused/applicant anticipated a dispute, but would still hand over the original documents to the counsel.
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
MAY 6, 2026/ dr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 11:40:08
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant accused of forgery deserved anticipatory bail in FIR No. 61/2026.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kunaal Kumar
State of NCT Delhi through SHO PS Mansarovar Park Delhi
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
