Regular bail application under Section 483 BNSS in a Section 302 IPC FIR was withdrawn by the applicant since a material eyewitness remained under examination before the Sessions Court; the Court dismissed it as withdrawn without commenting on merits and left rights reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~101
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP with Insp. Manish Bhati, P.S. Bhalswa Dairy.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 06.05.2026
BAIL APPLN. 1754/2026 Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/05/2026 at 10:56:26
examination, Mr. Ahmed seeks permission to withdraw the present application at this stage, without prejudice to the applicant’s right to approach the Sessions Court at the appropriate stage.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
MAY 6, 2026 “Bhupi/KA”/
BAIL APPLN. 1754/2026 Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/05/2026 at 10:56:26
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sheikh Hussain
State of NCT of Delhi
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
