Surender Maan Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 252/2018 of Police Station Alipur for offence under Section 3 & 4 Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act.

¶12

According to learned APP for State, there are seven protected witnesses in this case.

¶13

After addressing partly, learned counsel for accused/applicant seeks permission to withdraw this bail application with liberty to file afresh before the trial court after examination of all seven protected witnesses.

¶14

As requested, the bail application and the accompanying application are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought. Learned trial court is directed to examine all seven protected witnesses on priority basis and conclude recording of their testimony within six months.

¶15

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

¶16

MAY 6, 2026/as

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 11:38:59

Surender Maan v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surender Maan v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kapish Bawana Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Santosh Shankar Rao Patil Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Prachi Agrawal Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Vinay Sharma & Ors. Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Pradeep Kumar and Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Rakesh Sherawat Vs Rajni Sherawat