Dismissed¶6

Yash Alias Maan v. the State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Delhi HC20 Apr 2026BAIL APPLN./1507/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail sought in FIR No. 644/2023, PS Moti Nagar, under Section 307/34 IPC and Section 25/27/54/59 Arms Act by accused Yash alias Maan; application dismissed as withdrawn on 20.04.2026 (Girish Kathpalia, J.). Prior bail application 1880/2025 withdrawn 12.02.2026 pending testimony of injured Raju; Raju later supported prosecution case; sessions court rejected fresh bail application on 30.03.2026 (reasons at its para 6). Interim bail application pending before trial court; vakalatnama absent from present application.

What the court decided

AI extract

Yash Alias Maan Vs the State of NCT of Delhi and Anr. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~60

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 1507/2026 & CRL.M.A. 11974/2026 YASH ALIAS MAAN .....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate

¶5

versus

¶6

THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with SI Amit and SI Mohit

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

¶9

O R D E R % 20.04.2026

¶10

The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 644/2023 of Police Station Moti Nagar for offence under Section 307/34 IPC & Section 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Act.

¶11

It appears that earlier, vide order dated 12.02.2026, the bail application bearing No. 1880/2025 of the accused/applicant was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh before the trial court subsequent to the testimony of the injured Raju, who had not been appearing before the trial court. The injured Raju appeared and supported prosecution case in his testimony. Thereafter, the accused/applicant filed fresh bail application before the Court of Sessions, which was dismissed vide order dated 30.03.2026. By way of detailed reasons, described in paragraph 6 of the order dated 30.03.2026, the learned trial court dismissed the bail application. After that, the present application has been filed.

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/04/2026 at 11:36:21

¶14

At the outset, learned APP for State submits that the accused/applicant has also filed an interim bail application, which is pending before the trial court. In other words, the accused/applicant is proceeding before two courts simultaneously.

¶15

Further, it is found that the present bail application is not even accompanied with vakalatnama of the accused/applicant. That, apparently was to avoid any consequences of filing this application during pendency of the application before the trial court.

¶16

At this stage, learned counsel for accused/applicant seeks permission to withdraw this bail application.

¶17

As requested, the bail application and the accompanying application are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶18

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

¶19

APRIL 20, 2026/as

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/04/2026 at 11:36:21

Yash Alias Maan v. the State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Yash Alias Maan v. the State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Joginder Singh Kaundal Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

Sh Harish Arora Vs Directorate of Enforcement and Ors.

Mehboob Hassan Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Mamraj Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Anand Paswan Alias Panga Vs the State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Sourabh Dhawan Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi