Disposed¶19

Rajinder Kumar Jain v. State of NCT Delhi

Delhi HC1 Apr 2026BAIL APPLN./1250/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajinder Kumar Jain v. State of NCT Delhi; BAIL APPLN. 1250/2026 (with CRL.M.A. 9840-9842/2026); Delhi High Court; Justice Manoj Jain; order dated 01.04.2026; regular bail; FIR No.523/2024 dated 28.12.2024; Police Station Shakarpur; Section 420 IPC cheating; charges ascertained; complainant not yet examined; application not pressed; liberty to file afresh; interim bail on health grounds (aged ~70 years); State assurance to produce complainant by next hearing date 24.04.2026; rights and contentions reserved; bail application disposed.

What did the court decide?

Bail application disposed of as not pressed; liberty granted to file afresh once the complainant is examined (including an application for interim bail on health grounds before the Trial Court); all rights and contentions of parties reserved; pending applications disposed of.

Rajinder Kumar Jain Vs State of NCT Delhi — Cheating and Forgery | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~78

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 1250/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9840/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9841/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9842/2026

¶4

RAJINDER KUMAR JAIN .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Himanshu Yadav, Advocate. versus

¶6

STATE OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for the State with SI Satish Singh, PS Shakarpur.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 01.04.2026

¶10

Applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No.523/2024 dated 28.12.2024, registered at Police Station Shakarpur, for commission of offences under Section 420 IPC.

¶11

The charges have already been ascertained. However, complainant is yet to enter into witness box.

¶12

After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the applicant, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, does not press the present application, at this juncture. He, however, seeks permission to file application afresh once the complainant is examined. He also submits that prosecution may be directed to ensure his presence before the learned Trial Court without any delay. He contends that since the applicant is around 70 years of age and is not keeping well, the applicant may also be permitted to file application seeking interim bail on health grounds, before the learned

¶13

BAIL APPLN. 1250/2026

¶14

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 10:09:31

¶17

Trial Court.

¶18

Learned Addl. P.P. for the State assures that there would not be any delay or inaction on their part and every effort would be made to ensure the presence of the complainant before the learned Trial Court on the next date of hearing which is 24.04.2026.

¶19

In view of the above, the present application is disposed of as not pressed.

¶20

Liberty, as prayed, is granted.

¶21

Pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶22

All rights and contentions of parties are reserved.

¶23

MANOJ JAIN, J

¶24

APRIL 1, 2026 st/pb

¶25

BAIL APPLN. 1250/2026

¶26

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 10:09:31

Rajinder Kumar Jain v. State of NCT Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajinder Kumar Jain v. State of NCT Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kumar Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Faizan @ Bittoo Vs State NCT of Delhi through SHO Ps Harsh Vihar Delhi

Shubham Ad Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Bhupender Singh Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Manpreet Singh @ Tillu Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Manoj Kumar Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.