Disposed

Sagar v. State of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC17 Mar 2026BAIL APPLN./1061/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Sections 302/34 IPC and Sections 25/27 Arms Act in FIR No. 445/2023. Counsel did not press the application, seeking liberty to file afresh before the Court of Sessions. Application disposed of as not pressed with all rights and contentions reserved.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of as not pressed; liberty granted to file afresh before the Sessions court; rights and contentions reserved.

Sagar Vs State of NCT of Delhi — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~71

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 1061/2026&CRL.M.A. 7954/2026

¶4

SAGAR .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Parvesh Bansal and Mr. Rahul Bansal, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP with SI Mohit.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 17.03.2026

¶12

Applicant seeks regular bail in FIR No. 445/2023 dated 07.05.2023 registered at PS Mangol Puri, Delhi for the commission of offences under Sections 302/34 IPC and Sections 25/27 Arms Act, 1959.

¶13

Admittedly, earlier when the applicant had moved bail application before this Court, the same was disposed of vide order dated 17.05.2024 and the applicant was permitted to withdraw the abovesaid application with liberty to file the same after examination of the material witnesses.

¶14

Learned counsel for applicant submits that material witnesses have been examined and, therefore, the present application has been filed.

¶15

He, however, in all fairness, admits that after the abovesaid order dated 17.05.2024, he did not file any bail application before the learned Trial Court.

¶16

After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for applicant, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, does not press the present application with liberty to file it afresh before the learned Court of Sessions. 6. He, however, submits that in case, his such request is not acceded to by the learned Trial Court, he may be permitted to come to this Court again.

¶17

BAIL APPLN. 1061/2026

¶18

¶19

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2026 at 12:28:35

¶20

In view of the above, the application stands disposed of as pressed.

¶21

All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.

¶22

Liberty, as prayed, is granted.

¶23

MANOJ JAIN, J

¶24

MARCH 17, 2026/ sw/pb

¶25

BAIL APPLN. 1061/2026

¶26

¶27

Sagar v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sagar v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd Asif @ Arib @ Aaru Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Ashutosh Singh Rathi Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Yusuf Malik Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Maria Nuemia Albertina Vs Customs

Raj Kumar & Ors. Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Vikram Baghel & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.