Tata Capital Limited v. Ajay Kumar & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Delhi High Court, ARB.P. 847/2026, Subramonium Prasad J, order dated 11.05.2026. Section 11(6) Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 petition by Tata Capital Limited against Ajay Kumar & Anr for appointment of arbitrator under Loan Agreement dated 22.05.2025; Rs.30,21,382/- advanced; Loan Recall Notice dated 19.02.2026; Section 21 notice dated 05.03.2026 invoking Clause 9 arbitration clause naming multiple arbitral institutions. Court held Clause 9 required approaching a listed institution before filing the Section 11 petition; permission and liberty granted to withdraw and approach the institution, with liberty to approach the Court if the institution does not respond; petition disposed of as withdrawn with pending applications; exemption application allowed.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal permitted with liberty to approach any of the arbitral institutions mentioned in Clause 9 of the Loan Agreement and liberty to approach this Court in case the arbitral institution does not adhere to the Petitioner's request; petition disposed of as withdrawn along with pending application(s), if any.