Dismissed

Youthdosa Food Services LLP v. Kisetsu Saison Finance India Private Limited

Delhi HC23 Mar 2026ARB.P./529/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act sought appointment of a sole arbitrator for disputes under a Loan Agreement dated 24 November 2022. The arbitration clause placed the seat at Bangalore/Bengaluru. Counsel withdrew the petition with liberty to approach the Karnataka High Court; rights and contentions left open.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Karnataka High Court; parties' rights and contentions left open.

Youthdosa Food Services LLP Vs Kisetsu Saison Finance India… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~3

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 529/2025 & I.A. 7669/2025

¶4

YOUTHDOSA FOOD SERVICES LLP .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Joel, Mr. Sheeshpal Singh, Advocates

¶5

versus

¶6

KISETSU SAISON FINANCE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

¶7

.....Respondent

¶8

Through: Mr. Himanshu Mehra, Advocate (M:9711524131)

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶11

O R D E R % 23.03.2026

¶12

The present petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”) seeking appointment of Sole Arbitrator for adjudicating disputes between the parties arising out of the th Loan Agreement bearing no. 1545307 dated 24 November, 2022.

¶13

th 2. The petitioner entered into a Loan Agreement dated 24 November, 2022, and in terms of the said Loan Agreement, an arbitrator was to be appointed by the petitioner from the list containing names and details of the proposed arbitrator, as provided by the respondent through a notice.

¶14

As per the learned counsel for the petitioner, no notice was ever sent by the petitioner and a sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally by the respondent.

¶15

It is submitted that it is only when the petitioner received a notice from the learned Arbitrator as appointed by the respondent unilaterally, that

¶16

Page 1 of 3

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 11:19:29

¶19

the petitioner came to know about the initiation of arbitration proceedings.

¶20

Thus, it is submitted that the petitioner immediately approached this Court by way of the present petition.

¶21

Attention of this Court has been drawn to the arbitration clause, which reads as under:

¶22

“xxx xxx xxx

¶23

xxx xxx xxx”

¶24

Perusal of the aforesaid shows that as per the contract, arbitration shall be conducted with the seat at Bangalore/Bengaluru.

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner sought to justify filing of the petition before this Court by referring to Clause 20(e) of the Loan Agreement between the parties.

¶26

However, after some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to approach the

¶27

Page 2 of 3

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 11:19:29

¶30

Karnataka High Court.

¶31

Liberty is so granted.

¶32

Rights and contentions of both the parties are left open, to be raised before the competent Court of jurisdiction.

¶33

Accordingly, the present petition along with the pending application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.

¶34

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶35

MARCH 23, 2026/ au

¶36

Page 3 of 3

¶37

This is a digitally signed order.

¶38

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 11:19:29

Youthdosa Food Services LLP v. Kisetsu Saison Finance India Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Youthdosa Food Services LLP v. Kisetsu Saison Finance India Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiva Texyarn Ltd. Vs Official Liquidator of M/S Apollo Tubes and Steel Industries Ltd. & Ors.

Bhasin Infotech and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs Rajeev Jain and Sons (Huf)

M/S Rajeev Jain and Sons HUF Vs M/S Bhasin Infotech and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Ajay Kumar Singhal & Ors. Vs Mange Ram Gupta & Ors.

Radha Ors. Vs Ram Kishan Ors.

M/S Moneywise Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mr Kuwar Akashdeepsingh Cheema, Proprietor of Ali Baba Electronics and Anr.