M/S Ayvens India Private Limited Vs M/S Anil Rai Electronic Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. through Its Directors

¶1

$~8

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 479/2026

¶4

M/S AYVENS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhilesh Pradhan, Advocate Mob: 7827403519

¶5

versus

¶6

M/S ANIL RAI ELECTRONIC ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTORS .....Respondent

¶7

Through: None.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶9

O R D E R % 23.04.2026

¶10

Office noting shows that the respondent has been served through E- mail sent by the Registry.

¶11

Further, respondent also stands served by speed post, as well by ordinary modes.

¶12

Affidavit of service, filed on behalf of the petitioner is also on record, showing the service upon the respondent.

¶13

None appears for the respondent, when the matter is called out.

¶14

Accordingly, this Court proceeds with the matter.

¶15

The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”), seeking appointment of a sole Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes between the parties, arising out of the Lease Agreement and Agreement for Fee Management Services dated 10^th November, 2021.

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 11:17:22

¶18

Attention of this Court has been drawn to the Arbitration Clause, i.e., Article 9.2, which reads as under:

¶19

“xxx xxx xxx

¶20

xxx xxx xxx”

¶21

Perusal of the aforesaid clearly shows that there is a valid arbitration agreement between the parties and exclusive jurisdiction has been conferred to the Courts at New Delhi.

¶22

Further, attention of this Court has been drawn to the notice under Section 21 of the Arbitration Act, with proof of service of the said notice upon the respondent.

¶23

Accordingly, there is no impediment in appointing an Arbitrator.

¶24

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has an approximate claim of Rs. 30,00,000/-.

¶25

Accordingly, the following directions are issued:

¶26

i) Ms. Latika Malhotra, Advocate, (Mob: +91-9811895162) is appointed

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 11:17:22

¶29

as the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶30

ii) The remuneration of the Arbitrator shall be in terms of Schedule IV of the Arbitration Act.

¶31

iii) The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration in terms of Section 12 of the Arbitration Act prior to entering into the reference. In the event of any impediment to the Arbitrator’s appointment on that count, the parties are given liberty to file an appropriate application before this Court.

¶32

iv) It shall be open to the respondent to raise counter-claims, if any, in the arbitration proceedings.

¶33

v) It is made clear that all the rights and contentions of the parties, including, as to the arbitrability of any of the claim, any other preliminary objection, as well as claims/counter-claims and merits of the dispute of either of the parties, are left open for adjudication by the learned Arbitrator.

¶34

vi) The parties shall approach the learned Arbitrator within two (02) weeks from today.

¶35

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶36

A copy of the order passed today, be sent to the learned Arbitrator, for information and compliance.

¶37

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶38

APRIL 23, 2026/ SK

¶39

This is a digitally signed order.

¶40

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 11:17:22

M/S Ayvens India Private Limited v. M/S Anil Rai Electronic Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. through Its Directors

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Ayvens India Private Limited v. M/S Anil Rai Electronic Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. through Its Directors

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anupam Walia through Special Power of Attorney Holder Capt. Rakesh Walia Retd. Vs Roopa Arora & Anr.

Axis Finance Limited Vs Rahil Akhtar Ansari

Axis Finance Limited Vs Sunilkumar N Dube

Sarr Freights Corporation Vs Rites Limited

Sarr Freights Corporation Vs Rites Limited

Anil Madan & Anr. Vs Manish Madan & Anr.