Moneywise Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Jai Shree Balaji Agencies and Ors.

The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”) seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of the disputes between the parties, arising out of the Loan Agreement dated 31^st December, 2024 (“Loan Agreement”).

¶10

The Court records that Affidavit of Service has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, as per which, the respondents stand served through E-mail as well as Speed Post.

¶11

However, none appears for the respondents when the matter is called out, and further, no reply has been filed on their behalf. Accordingly, this Court proceeds with the present matter.

¶12

As per the fact on record, the petitioner had granted a loan of Rs. 21,21,884/- (Rupees Twenty One Lacs Twenty One Thousand Eight Hundred and Eighty Four Only) to the respondents vide the Loan Agreement, as per which, the respondents were to repay the said loan in 36

¶13

Page 1 of 4

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2026 at 11:27:39

¶16

equated monthly instalments, along with interest @ 19% per annum. 5. Disputes have arisen between the parties as the respondents have failed in their payment obligations under the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement. On account thereof, the petitioner was constrained to issue a Loan Recall & Termination Notice dated 11^th August, 2025, whereby, the respondents were called upon to repay the outstanding loan amount, along with the interest applicable thereupon.

¶17

As no payment was forthcoming, the petitioner issued a Notice dated 04^th September, 2025 under Section 21 of the Arbitration Act, invoking the Arbitration Clause between the parties, i.e., Clause 8.2 of the Loan Agreement. However, despite due receipt of the aforesaid Notice, the respondents have failed to submit any response thereto or remit the outstanding dues.

¶18

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the Arbitration Clause, i.e., Clause 8.2 as contained in the Loan Agreement, which is reproduced as under:

¶19

“

¶20

”

¶21

Perusal of the aforesaid Arbitration Clause clearly shows that there is a valid Arbitration Agreement between the parties, whereby, the parties have

¶22

Page 2 of 4

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2026 at 11:27:39

¶25

agreed that the disputes shall be settled by arbitration, in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration Act. Furthermore, Clause 8.2 stipulates that the seat of arbitration proceedings between the parties shall be at Delhi.

¶26

This Court notes the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that all the three respondents are signatories to the Loan Agreement.

¶27

Further, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has an approximate claim of Rs. 22,95,499/- (Rupees Twenty Two Lacs Ninety Five Thousand Four Hundred and Ninety Nine Only).

¶28

Thus, in view of the existence of a valid Arbitration Agreement between the parties, as well as the disputes that have arisen between the parties, this Court is of the considered opinion that there is no impediment in appointment of an Arbitrator.

¶29

Accordingly, considering the submissions made before this Court, the following directions are issued:

¶30

i. Mr. Abhinav Singh, Advocate, (Mobile No.: +91-9811188892) is appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶31

ii. The remuneration of the Arbitrator shall be in terms of Schedule IV of the Arbitration Act.

¶32

iii. The Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration in terms of Section 12 of the Arbitration Act prior to entering into the reference. In the event there is any impediment to the Arbitrator’s appointment on that count, the parties are given liberty to file an appropriate application before this Court.

¶33

iv. It shall be open to the respondents to raise counter-claims, if any, in

¶34

Page 3 of 4

¶35

This is a digitally signed order.

¶36

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2026 at 11:27:39

¶37

the arbitration proceedings.

¶38

v. It is made clear that all the rights and contentions of the parties, including, the arbitrability of any of the claims and/or counter-claims, any other preliminary objection, as well as claims on merits of the dispute of either of the parties, are left open for adjudication by the learned Arbitrator.

¶39

vi. The parties shall approach the Arbitrator within two (2) weeks from today.

¶40

The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶41

The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the learned Arbitrator, for information and compliance.

¶42

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶43

MAY 13, 2026/ ak

¶44

Page 4 of 4

¶45

This is a digitally signed order.

¶46

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2026 at 11:27:39

Moneywise Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Jai Shree Balaji Agencies and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Moneywise Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Jai Shree Balaji Agencies and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Moneywise Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sandeep Synthetic and Ors.

Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited Vs Ritu Rani & Anr.

Vikas Mathur Vs Mahender Singh and Ors.

Shri Manish Maggu Vs Tnp Sports Management Pvt. Ltd.

Ajit Singh Maker & Anr. Vs Pritpal Singh & Ors.

Harsh Sardana HUF Vs Raushan Priya & Ors.