Dismissed¶17

Ms Shilpkar India Designers and Contractors Pvt. Ltd. v. Ms Colliers International (India) Property Services Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC15 Apr 2026ARB.P./2013/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996; appointment of arbitrator; arbitration clause contract dated 07.12.2022; seat of arbitration Mumbai versus Gurgaon; preliminary objection on venue; jurisdiction clause courts at New Delhi exclusive jurisdiction subject to arbitration provisions; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach appropriate court; pending application disposed of; ARB.P. 2013/2025; Delhi High Court; Justice Avneesh Jhingan; Shilpkar India Designers and Contractors v. Colliers International (India) Property Services.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to withdraw the petition and approach the appropriate court; pending application (I.A. 30110/2025) disposed of. ¶17

Ms Shilpkar India Designers and Contractors Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ms… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~8

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 2013/2025 & I.A. 30110/2025

¶4

MS SHILPKAR INDIA DESIGNERS AND CONTRACTORS PVT LTD ....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Bipin Prabhat, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

MS COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL (INDIA) PROPERTY SERVICES PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rizwan, Ms. Sachi Chopra & Mr. Wasil Arafat, Advs.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 15.04.2026

¶11

The present petition is filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short „the Act‟) for appointment of an arbitrator under the clause in contract dated 07.12.2022.

¶12

Learned counsel for the respondent raises a preliminary objection that as per the arbitration clause the arbitration is to be held at Mumbai. The submission is that the work was awarded at Gurgaon and the contract was executed in Gurgaon.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time relying upon the jurisdiction clause of the contract wherein it is stated that the courts at New Delhi shall have exclusive jurisdiction with respect to the matters arising out of this order and realizing this clause starts with the phrase

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 12:43:49

¶16

“subject to arbitration provisions herein”, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the appropriate court.

¶17

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending application stands disposed of.

¶18

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J

¶19

APRIL 15, 2026 ‘ha’

¶20

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 12:43:49

Ms Shilpkar India Designers and Contractors Pvt. Ltd. v. Ms Colliers International (India) Property Services Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ms Shilpkar India Designers and Contractors Pvt. Ltd. v. Ms Colliers International (India) Property Services Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Intense Technologies Limited Vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

Ofb Tech Limited Vs Elixir Extracts Private Limited & Ors.

Relan Infracon Pvt. Ltd. Vs Jasvinder Kaur

M/S Morphing Inovation (Opc) Private Limited (Mipl) Vs National Highway Authority of India & Anr.

NTPC Limited Vs Mudajaya Corporation, Malaysia Berhad

Continental Carbon India Private Limited Vs Aeiforia Constructions Private Limited