Disposed¶20

Clix Capital Services Pvt. Ltd. v. v and L Diagnostic Centre LLP & Ors.

Delhi HC2 Feb 2026ARB.P./194/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: arbitration petition; Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996; appointment of Arbitrator; notice under Section 21 not served; withdrawal of Section 11 petition; liberty to re-approach the Court; no observations on merits; exemption application allowed; Delhi High Court; ARB.P.; Clix Capital Services Pvt Ltd; V and L Diagnostic Centre LLP. Relevant for practitioners assessing withdrawal of a Section 11(6) petition where the Section 21 notice has not been served and the availability of re-filing thereafter.

What did the court decide?

Petition withdrawn with permission granted; liberty to approach the Court again after fulfilling the mandate under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; I.A. 2292/2026 (Exemption) allowed subject to all just exceptions. ¶20

Clix Capital Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs v and L Diagnostic Centre LLP… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶20

Issue for consideration

Whether an Arbitrator should be appointed to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties, on a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (left undecided, as the petition was withdrawn).

¶14

Ratio / Principle

I.A. 2292/2026 (Exemption) allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

Key takeaways

Permission to withdraw the petition was granted on the ground that the Petitioner had not served the notice mandated under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to the Respondents.ratio¶16
Liberty granted to the Petitioner to approach this Court once again after fulfilling the mandate under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.ratio¶19
The Petition is disposed of as withdrawn, along with the pending applications, if any.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Delhi at New Delhi (Subramonium Prasad, J.), ARB.P. 194/2026, Clix Capital Services Pvt Ltd v. V and L Diagnostic Centre LLP & Ors., order dated 02.02.2026: Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the parties. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner sought permission to withdraw on the ground that the Petitioner had not served the notice mandated under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to the Respondents. Permission was granted; the petition was disposed of as withdrawn along with pending applications; liberty was granted to approach the Court once again after fulfilling the mandate under Section 21. The Court expressly made no observations on the merits of the case. I.A. 2292/2026 (Exemption) was allowed subject to all just exceptions.

Clix Capital Services Pvt. Ltd. v. v and L Diagnostic Centre LLP & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Clix Capital Services Pvt. Ltd. v. v and L Diagnostic Centre LLP & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T. Prasad Rao Dora Vs Ather Parwez Ansari

Sh Arun Singh Vs Mrs Saguna Puri Singh & Ors.

Ather Parwez Ansari Vs Bimal Kumar Mishra

Shri Bhagwan Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs C S Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Smt. Ritu Aggarwal & Ors. Vs Shri Naresh Kumar Jain & Anr.

Manjari Agrawal & Ors. Vs Brajendra Kumar Agrawal & Ors.