Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited v. Shubham Kumar Mishra & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Arbitration petition (ARB.P. 1922/2025) before Delhi High Court, decided 28.03.2026 by Justice Mini Pushkarna. Respondents refused Speed Post notice and were nonetheless deemed served. Stamp in Schedule-I of the Agreement showed Delhi as place of arbitration, but agreement executed at Allahabad and respondents based at Allahabad; Court held place of arbitration means venue only, not seat. Petitioner withdrew; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach a court of jurisdiction. No statutes or precedent cases cited in the order.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in a court of jurisdiction. ¶18