In Arbitration Petition 1776/2025, the Delhi High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn after learned counsel submitted that the parties had arrived at a settlement and no claims remained pending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
MR. MADHAV SUREKA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vedika Sureka, Advocate versus
FOOTPRINTS CHILDCARE PVT LTD AND ANR
.....Respondents
Through: Ms. Surabhi Tyagi, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R
% 16.01.2026
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
JANUARY 16, 2026/ au
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/01/2026 at 12:19:00
MR. MADHAV SUREKA
FOOTPRINTS CHILDCARE PVT LTD AND ANR
MINI PUSHKARNA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
