In an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator, the Delhi High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn following a settlement between the parties during its pendency.
The petition for appointment of a Sole Arbitrator and the pending application are dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
AXIS FINANCE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pardeep Kumar, Adv Mob: 9811504426
versus
SUSHANT ANANT MUTKE .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 12.02.2026
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2026/ ak
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2026 at 10:10:50
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to entertain the petition for appointment of a Sole Arbitrator when the parties have settled the dispute outside the arbitration forum.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Axis Finance Limited
Sushant Anant Mutke
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
