The petitioner withdrew the arbitration petition after the respondent stated it was under CIRP. The court granted leave to withdraw with liberty to approach the Resolution Professional for any claims.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Resolution Professional.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~82
CNR No. DLHC010437392026
versus
TECHNOFAB ENGINEERING LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Karan Gandhi, Ms. Riya Jain, Ms. Vidhika Kapoor, Mr. Sikhar Tiwari, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J
SEPTEMBER 16, 2026/at
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:ANUBHAV TRIPATHI Signing Da te:1 7.09.2026 10:43:59
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the arbitration petition should proceed when the respondent is under the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A S Chaudhary Enterprises
Technofab Engineering Limited
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
