Disposed¶24

Pidge Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Skye Air Mobility Prvate Limited

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 11(6) petition – Appointment of sole arbitrator – Merchant Services Agreement dated 16.09.2024

Delhi HC12 Mar 2026ARB.P./153/2026

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court order dated 12.03.2026 in ARB.P. 153/2026 (Pidge Technologies Pvt Ltd v. Skye Air Mobility Private Limited): Section 11(6) application allowed/disposed by appointing Ms. Shreya Mathur, Advocate as Sole Arbitrator for disputes under Merchant Services Agreement dated 16.09.2024; venue/seat Delhi; arbitration administered under DIAC rules; claim amount Rs. 6,40,032/-; all rights and contentions open before arbitrator.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Ms. Shreya Mathur, Advocate as Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the parties under the Merchant Services Agreement dated 16.09.2024, with arbitration under DIAC rules ¶24

Pidge Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Skye Air Mobility Prvate Limited — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~2

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 153/2026

¶4

PIDGE TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD

¶5

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Asav Rajan and Mr. Akash Saxena, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

SKYE AIR MOBILITY PRIVATE LIMITED

¶8

.....Respondent Through: Ms. Rashi Gupta, Advocate.

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

¶10

O R D E R % 12.03.2026

¶11

The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the Petitioner seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes which have arisen between the parties under the Merchant Services Agreement dated 16.09.2024 ( hereinafter referred to as “Agreement” ).

¶12

Under the Agreement, the Petitioner agreed to provide its platform to the Respondent, to enable the Respondent to access the details of vendors providing delivery services and the Petitioner was to operate as an e- commerce operator. It is stated that disputes arose between the parties on account of failure on part of the Respondent to clear the outstanding dues against the invoices raised by the Petitioner.

¶13

Clause 8.1 of the Agreement contains an arbitration clause, which

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2026 at 12:23:42

¶16

specifies that the venue of arbitration shall be at Delhi. There is no contra indicia which shows that the parties have decided that the seat of the arbitration would be at any other place other than Delhi.

¶17

A notice under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was sent by the Petitioner to the Respondent on 08.08.2025 invoking arbitration and claiming a sum of Rs. 6,40,032/-, which according to the Petitioner is due and payable by the Respondent.

¶18

In view of the fact that disputes have arisen between the Parties and the Agreement contains an arbitration clause, this Court is inclined to appoint an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties.

¶19

Accordingly, Ms. Shreya Mathur, Advocate (Mob. No.8527080105) is appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties.

¶20

The arbitration would take place under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) and would abide by its rules and regulations. The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.

¶21

The learned Arbitrator is also requested to file the requisite disclosure under Section 12(2) of the 1996 Act within two weeks of entering on reference.

¶22

All rights and contentions of the parties in relation to the claims/counter-claims are kept open, to be decided by the learned Arbitrator on their merits, in accordance with law.

¶23

Needless to say, nothing in this order shall be construed as an expression of this Court on the merits of the contentions of the parties.

¶24

The petition stands disposed of in the above terms, along with

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2026 at 12:23:42

¶27

pending application(s), if any.

¶28

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J

¶29

MARCH 12, 2026 S. Zakir

¶30

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2026 at 12:23:42

Pidge Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Skye Air Mobility Prvate Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pidge Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Skye Air Mobility Prvate Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashima Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation

Union of India Vs M/S Shiva Const. Company

Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited Vs Gyan Babu Sharma & Anr.

M/S Shree Ganesh Metals Vs Glencore Internationa Ag & Anr.

Pure Diets India Ltd. Vs Lokmangal Agro Industries Ltd. & Ors.

Rakesh Kumar Sharma Vs Sh. Ganshyam Sharma and Anr.