Ashok Kumar Muthreja v. M/S Wtc Faridabad Infrastructure Development Ltd.

Delhi HC23 Feb 2026ARB.P./1122/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996; appointment of sole arbitrator Ms. Shriya Maini by consent; Schedule IV fees; Section 12 disclosure compliance; ARB.P. 1122/2025; Delhi High Court; Ashok Kumar Muthreja v M/s WTC Faridabad Infrastructure Development Ltd; no opinion on merits; claims/counterclaims before arbitrator.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Ms. Shriya Maini, Advocate, as sole arbitrator (with the consent of the parties) to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. ¶¶13

Ashok Kumar Muthreja Vs M/S Wtc Faridabad Infrastructure… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~3

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 1122/2025 & I.A. 18451/2025

¶4

ASHOK KUMAR MUTHREJA .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Suresh Sharma, Mr. Dhruv Sharma & Ms. Gemini Sharma, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

M/S WTC FARIDABAD INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shubham Janghu, Adv.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 23.02.2026

¶11

The present petition is filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘the Act’) for appointment of an arbitrator.

¶12

Learned counsel for the respondents on instructions has no objection for referring the matter to arbitration.

¶13

Accordingly, the petition is allowed by appointing Ms. Shriya Maini, Advocate (Mobile No:8799791969), with the consent of the parties, as the sole arbitrator for adjudication of the disputes which have arisen between the parties.

¶14

The fees of the learned Arbitrator will be governed by Schedule IV of the Act. Before entering upon reference, the learned Arbitrator will comply with Section 12 of the Act.

¶15

It is made clear that since this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the rival claims of the parties, it will be open for the parties to

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/02/2026 at 14:53:21

¶18

file their respective claims/counter claims before the learned Arbitrator which will be considered in accordance with law.

¶19

A copy of this order be forwarded to the learned Arbitrator for information.

¶20

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J

¶21

FEBRUARY 23, 2026 Ch

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/02/2026 at 14:53:21

Ashok Kumar Muthreja v. M/S Wtc Faridabad Infrastructure Development Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Kumar Muthreja v. M/S Wtc Faridabad Infrastructure Development Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Siddhant Shangle Vs Government of NCT of Delhi Public Works Department

M/S Skb Project (I) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Army Welfare Housing Organization

Dinesh Gupta & Anr. Vs Maman Singh & Ors.

Primetals Technologies India Private Limited Vs Steel Authority of India Limited & Ors.

PNB Housing Finance Ltd. Vs Kailash Saroj Charitable Trust & Ors.

Posist Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sanchit Sahni