The High Court of Delhi dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution and absence of counsel on behalf of the petitioner for three continuous hearing dates.
Dismissal of the writ petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
C�R �o. DLHC014230642015
THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ......Petitioners
versus
ANIL KUMAR AND ORS ......Respondents Through:
CORAM:
HO�'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHA�KAR HO�'BLE MR. JUSTICE VI�OD KUMAR
ORDER (ORAL) % 06.08.2026
C. HARI SHA�KAR, J.
1. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
2. We find that the petitioner has not been appearing in this matter continuously and remained unrepresented in these proceedings for the last three dates of hearing.
3. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in default and for nonprosecution.
C. HARI SHA�KAR, J.
VI�OD KUMAR, J.
AUGUST 6, 2026/ dd
Signature Not Ver ified
W.P.(C) 9970/2015 Signed By:PRAMOD KUMAR VATS Signing D ate: 13.08.2026 13:23:35
Page 1 of 1
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
ANIL KUMAR AND ORS
C HARI SHANKAR
VIJOD KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
