Petitioner sought redressal of a grievance concerning unauthorized construction and encroachment. The court directed him to approach the Special Task Force constituted pursuant to Supreme Court directions in M.C. Mehta, with the grievance to be taken to its logical end with due expedition, and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
Through: Mr. Ravinder Mehandru, Advocate.
versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
“In view of this situation, we direct that there should not be any further construction in unauthorized colonies including on public land beyond the existing building and other bye-laws. Consequently, all building and construction activity in the unauthorized colonies including on public land is stopped with immediate effect beyond the existing building and other bye- laws applicable to authorized colonies. The concerned authorities will ensure compliance.
It has been submitted by learned Additional Solicitor General (Mr. Nadkarni) that a Task Force is contemplated that will ensure that the orders of this Court and the applicable byelaws are implemented and encroachments, etc. as well as unauthorized constructions are removed.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/01/2026 at 13:41:21
The Task Force as suggested by learned Additional Solicitor General (Mr. Nadkarni) may be constituted with immediate effect. As a first step, the Task Force should remove encroachments on public roads, public streets and pedestrian streets, as mentioned in the immediate action submitted by Mr. Nadkarni in a Revised Note dated 18th April, 2018. The needful should be done within a period of two weeks from today.
We make it clear that the Monitoring Committee may suggest to the Task Force the areas where immediate action is required to be taken.
It is stated by learned Additional Solicitor General (Mr. Maninder Singh) that about 27.02 acres of public land has been taken over by the Delhi Development Authority since 1st April, 2018. The details of this have not been mentioned. An affidavit should be filed giving full details of the 27.02 acres of public land that has been taken over by the Delhi Development Authority from unauthorized encroachments.”
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
JANUARY 12, 2026 tr/mj
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/01/2026 at 13:41:21
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's grievance regarding unauthorized construction/encroachment should be addressed by the Special Task Force constituted under Supreme Court directions.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M.C. Mehta v. Union of IndiaRelied on¶1
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
Sunil Kumar
District Magistrate & Ors.
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
