Petitioner sought withdrawal of the revision petition, with liberty to pursue remedies in accordance with law. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and granted liberty; pending applications were rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66
SUMITRA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Arun Sharma and Mr. Sandeep Tyagi, Advs.
versus
TEJVEER SINGH KARDAM .....Respondent Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 06.04.2026
ANISH DAYAL, J
APRIL 6, 2026/MK/ bp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2026 at 12:34:54
SUMITRA
TEJVEER SINGH KARDAM
ANISH DAYAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
