Dismissed¶¶25

Lt Col Jerin Kuruvilla v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC7 Apr 2026W.P.(C)/9229/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Armed Forces transfer and posting; judicial non-interference in service matters; compassionate grounds; medical grounds for posting; Medical Board opinion dated 21.07.2025; benign/low-grade malignant tumour; oncology and gastroenterology centre proximity; posting at Meerut offered by Respondents; Article 226 writ jurisdiction; vacation of interim stay dated 07.07.2025; CM APPL. 21935/2026; W.P.(C) 9229/2025; Lt Col Jerin Kuruvilla v. Union of India; transfer from Mumbai to 30 MFVH Darchula, Uttarakhand.

What did the court decide?

It is a settled position of law that transfer and posting of personnel, particularly in the Armed Forces, fall within the domain of the employer and ordinarily do not warrant judicial interference, unless shown to be vitiated by mala fides, arbitrariness, or violation of statutory provisions. ¶¶19

Lt Col Jerin Kuruvilla Vs Union of India & Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

¶¶25

Issue for consideration

Whether the Writ Petition warrants judicial interference with the Impugned Transfer Order (posting from Mumbai to 30 MFVH, Darchula, Uttarakhand) on compassionate grounds, given the medical condition of the Petitioner's aged mother suffering from cancer requiring continuous medical supervision. +1 more

¶¶16

Court's answer

¶¶19

Ratio / Principle

The Medical Board did not recommend retention of the Petitioner at his present station (Mumbai) but only advised that he be posted at a station having proximity to requisite medical facilities; hence the compassionate-ground plea did not establish a case for interference.

¶¶22

Key takeaways

In view of the Respondents offering the Petitioner a posting at Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, which is in close proximity to Delhi and has access to well-established super-speciality hospitals, the concern projected by the Petitioner stands substantially addressed.ratio¶¶23
No ground is made out to interfere with the Impugned Transfer Order in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.ratio¶¶24

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Delhi High Court (Anil Kshetarpal & Amit Mahajan, JJ.), order dated 07.04.2026 in W.P.(C) 9229/2025, dismissed the petition of Lt Col Jerin Kuruvilla, a serving officer, assailing his posting order dated 09.05.2025 transferring him from Mumbai (where he had served since August 2021) to 30 MFVH, Darchula, Uttarakhand. The plea rested on compassionate grounds: the Petitioner's aged mother suffers a benign/low-grade malignant tumour requiring six-monthly outpatient follow-up, and the Medical Board (opinion dated 21.07.2025) advised posting in proximity to an Oncology Centre and a Gastroenterology Centre. The Court held that transfers and postings in the Armed Forces fall within the employer's domain and ordinarily do not warrant judicial interference unless vitiated by mala fides, arbitrariness or violation of statutory provisions; observed that the Medical Board had not recommended retention at the present station, only proximity to requisite facilities; and found the concern substantially addressed by the Respondents' offer of posting at Meerut, Uttar Pradesh (approximately 70-80 kilometres from Delhi), with advanced oncology and gastroenterology facilities. Concluding that no ground for interference existed under Article 226, the Court dismissed the Writ Petition, vacated the interim order dated 07.07.2025, disposed of CM APPL. 21935/2026, and cancelled the hearing scheduled for 18.05.2026.

¶1

$~69

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 9229/2025 LT COL JERIN KURUVILLA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shruti Rawat, Adv.

¶4

versus

¶5

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satya Ranjan Swain, CGSC with Col Sarika and Major Tarun Pillai.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

¶8

O R D E R % 07.04.2026

¶9

CM APPL. 21935/2026 [For vacation of stay]

¶10

The present Application has been preferred on behalf of the Respondents seeking vacation of the interim order dated 07.07.2025 passed by the Predecessor Bench of this Court, whereby the operation of the Impugned Transfer Order was stayed.

¶11

Though the application is listed for hearing, with the consent of learned counsel representing the parties, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal at this stage.

¶12

W.P.(C) 9229/2025

¶13

The present Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner assailing the posting order dated 09.05.2025 [hereinafter referred to as „Impugned Transfer Order‟], whereby the Petitioner, a serving officer, has been transferred from his earlier place of posting at Mumbai, Maharashtra, where he had been serving since August 2021, to 30 MFVH, Darchula, Uttarakhand.

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2026 at 13:13:59

¶16

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Impugned Transfer Order warrants interference primarily on compassionate grounds. It is contended that the Petitioner is required to take care of his aged mother, who is stated to be suffering from cancer and requires continuous medical supervision at a specialized medical facility.

¶17

In this regard, reliance has been placed upon the opinion of the Medical Board dated 21.07.2025, which records that the Petitioner's mother is suffering from a benign/low-grade malignant tumor and requires follow-up every six months on an outpatient basis. The Medical Board has further opined that the officer may be posted at a station in proximity to an Oncology Centre as well as a Gastroenterology Centre.

¶18

During the course of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the Respondents, on instructions, submits that the Petitioner has now been offered a posting at Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, which is situated at a distance of approximately 70-80 kilometres from Delhi, where advanced medical facilities, including specialized oncology and gastroenterology centres, are readily available.

¶19

This Court has considered the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the material placed on record. 8. It is a settled position of law that transfer and posting of personnel, particularly in the Armed Forces, fall within the domain of the employer and ordinarily do not warrant judicial interference, unless the same is shown to be vitiated by mala fides , arbitrariness, or violation of statutory provisions.

¶20

In the present case, the principal ground urged by the Petitioner pertains to the medical condition of his mother and the necessity of

¶21

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2026 at 13:13:59

¶22

being posted at a place where adequate medical facilities are available. The Medical Board itself has not recommended retention at the present station but has only advised that the officer be posted at a station having proximity to requisite medical facilities.

¶23

In view of the stand now taken by the Respondents offering posting at Meerut, which is in close proximity to Delhi and has access to well-established super-speciality hospitals, the concern sought to be projected by the Petitioner stands substantially addressed.

¶24

In these circumstances, this Court is of the considered view that no ground is made out to interfere with the Impugned Transfer Order in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

¶25

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the interim order dated 07.07.2025 stands vacated and CM APPL. 21935/2026 is disposed of.

¶26

The next date of hearing, i.e., 18.05.2026, stands cancelled.

¶27

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

¶28

AMIT MAHAJAN, J.

¶29

APRIL 07, 2026 s.godara/pal

¶30

This is a digitally signed order.

¶31

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2026 at 13:13:59

Lt Col Jerin Kuruvilla v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lt Col Jerin Kuruvilla v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ex Ct Ashok Kumar Sahoo Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ravinder Singh Vs Indian Bank & Anr.

Nuraisa Khatoon Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Sh Dinesh Kumar Vs State Bank of India and Others

Artex Textile Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Appraisement)

Durgam Santoshini Vs National Testing Agency Nta & Ors.

Tata Play Ltd. Vs Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs & Ors.

M/S Supreme Build-Cap Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle (5), Delhi

Ex Ct Ashok Kumar Sahoo Vs Union of India & Ors.

M/S Sahaj Solar Limited Vs Border Security Force & Ors.

M/S Sahaj Solar Limited Vs Border Security Force & Ors.

Nb Sub Ramakant Singh Vs Union of India

M/S Indraprastha Services Vs Union of India & Anr.

M/S Rajender Tourist through Its Proprietor Mr Ajay Vashisht Vs Directorate of Education & Anr.