Mukesh Kumar Khoraniya Vs Union of India and Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Mukesh Kumar Khoraniya Vs Union of India and Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Petition disposed of on the respondents' concession (on instructions) that it be treated as a representation; the petitioner's request for posting where CGHS facilities and dispensary are available to be taken into account in giving fresh posting; impugned transfer order kept in abeyance till fresh posting orders are passed, whereafter a fresh modified order is to be issued.

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, who has undergone a renal transplant and requires medication, should be given a fresh posting at a place where CGHS facilities and dispensary are available, in lieu of the impugned transfer.

Court's answer

Accepting the respondents' suggestion conveyed on instructions, the Court decided that the petition will be treated as a representation, and the petitioner's request for posting at a place where CGHS facilities and dispensary are available will be taken into account in the matter of giving fresh posting to him.

Ratio / Principle

Till the respondents pass orders giving fresh posting to the petitioner, the impugned order of transfer shall be kept in abeyance, and a fresh modified order is to be issued thereafter.

Key takeaways

The concession of treating the petition as a representation was made by learned counsel for the respondents having regard to the peculiar facts of this case, viz. the petitioner's medical ailment and the medication he requires, as he has already undergone a renal transplant.obiter¶17

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

W.P.(C) 9111/2026 & CM APPL. 42746/2026 (Mukesh Kumar Khoraniya v. Union of India and Ors.), High Court of Delhi, coram Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Amit Sharma JJ., order dated 22.07.2026: Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, conceded that the petition - filed by an employee who has undergone a renal transplant and requires medication - be treated as a representation, with his request for posting at a place where CGHS facilities and dispensary are available to be taken into account in the matter of giving fresh posting. The Court deemed it appropriate to dispose of the petition by accepting that suggestion, directing that the impugned order of transfer be kept in abeyance till the respondents pass orders giving fresh posting, and that a fresh modified order be issued thereafter.

$~82

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

- W.P.(C) 9111/2026 & CM APPL. 42746/2026

MUKESH KUMAR KHORANIYA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Kumar Sinha, Advocate

versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Neeraj CGSC with Mr. Dev Pratap Shahi GP along with Mr. Subhranta Sarkar (Inspector, SSB)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

O R D E R

% 22.07.2026 1. Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, states that the petition of the petitioner will be treated as representation and his request for transferring him to such place wherever the CGHS facilities and dispensary are available shall be taken into account in the matter of giving fresh posting to the petitioner.

In such an eventuality, it is stated that the petition can be treated as a representation.

That being so, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the present petition by accepting the aforesaid suggestion coming out from learned counsel for the respondents on instructions.

Till such orders are passed by the respondents giving fresh posting to the petitioner, the impugned order of transfer shall be kept in abeyance and a

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2026 at 12:06:00

fresh modified order be issued thereafter.

The petition stands disposed of in above terms.

The aforesaid concession i.e. consideration of the present petition as a representation is made by learned counsel for the respondents having regard to the peculiar facts of this case, viz., medical ailment of petitioner and the medical facilities which are required to him in the form of medication as he has already undergone a renal transplant.

NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J

AMIT SHARMA, J

JULY 22, 2026/ ay/ok

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2026 at 12:06:00