The High Court of Delhi dismissed multiple writ petitions filed by the Union of India after the learned counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the applications.
Writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~47 & 48
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
.....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Ranjeev Khatana, SPC with Mr. Rohit Kapoor, Mr. Kapil Malikh and Mr. Arjav Sethi, Advs.
versus
GIAN CHAND & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Trivedi, Mr. Yogesh Sharma and Mr. Ankur Rawal, Advs.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Ranjeev Khatana, SPC with Mr. Rohit Kapoor, Mr Kapil Malik and Mr. Mr Arjav Sethi, Advs.
versus
DAMADOR PRASAD GARG & ORS. .....Respondents Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
ORDER (ORAL) % 07.07.2026
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AJITW.P.(C) 8850/2026 and connected matter KUMAR Signing Da te:0 8.07.2026 17:57:52
Page 1 of 2
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. After some hearing, learned Counsel for the petitioners on instructions seeks leave to withdraw these writ petitions.
2. The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J.
VINOD KUMAR, J.
JULY 7, 2026 /aky
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:AJITW.P.(C) 8850/2026 and connected matter KUMAR Signing Da te:0 8.07.2026 17:57:52
Page 2 of 2
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
GIAN CHAND & ORS.
DAMADOR PRASAD GARG & ORS.
C. HARI SHANKAR
VINOD KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
