Civil writ petition dismissed in default and for non-prosecution as no party had appeared for a long period and the court notice sent to the last address in the Memo of Parties came back endorsed 'No such person resides at the given address'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
versus
BROADCAST ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INDIA LIMITED AND ORS. .....Respondents
Through:
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
FEBRUARY 24, 2026/ va
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/02/2026 at 13:14:49
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed in default and for non-prosecution where no party has appeared for long and the court notice was returned undelivered.
Archana Singh
Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Limited
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
