Writ petition sought direction to implement 33% reservation for women in elections to the Delhi Medical Council and Delhi Medical Association. As the elections had already been held on 31 May 2026, the court held the petition infructuous and disposed of it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
DR ANJU GAMBHIR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rupesh Dutta and Ms. Snehlata Chaturvedi, Advocates.
versus
GNCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shiven Varma and Mr. Rudraksh Mathur, Advocates for R-1 and R-2. Mr. Tushar Sannu and Mr. Parvin Bansal, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
%
01.07.2026
AMIT BANSAL, J
JULY 1, 2026 Vivek/-
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2026 at 11:45:09
DR ANJU GAMBHIR
GNCT OF DELHI
Respondent no.2
Respondent no.3
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
