Petitioner sought a writ direction to the Central Administrative Tribunal to decide his OA expeditiously while already having an early-hearing application pending before the Tribunal. The court held the petition was not maintainable and a mere shot in the dark, noting no appearance, and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
BIPIN KUMAR ROY .....Petitioner Through: None
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Saket, SPCG with Mr. Nipun Jain, GP, Mr. Manish Madhukar, Mr. Abhigyan and Ms. Reya Paul, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
%
ORDER (ORAL) 01.07.2026
C.HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. None appears to prosecute this writ petition.
2. According to us, this writ petition is not even maintainable. The only prayer of the petitioner is to direct the Central Administrative Tribunal1 to decide his OA expeditiously.
3. Besides the fact that we cannot monitor the progress of proceedings in the Tribunal, we note that the petitioner has admittedly already filed an application before the Tribunal seeking early hearing, which is presently pending.
1 “Tribunal” hereinafter Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AJITW.P.(C) 8492/2026 KUMAR Signing Da te:0 2.07.2026 15:21:25
Page 1 of 2
4. We are clueless as to how the petitioner can simultaneously maintain proceedings for early hearing of the OA before the Tribunal as well as before this Court.
5. This petition appears to be a mere shot in the dark.
6. We have also noted that no one has appeared to prosecute this petition when the matter is called out.
7. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
VINOD KUMAR, J
JULY 1, 2026 /AR
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:AJITW.P.(C) 8492/2026 KUMAR Signing Da te:0 2.07.2026 15:21:25
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking a direction to the Central Administrative Tribunal to decide the petitioner's OA expeditiously is maintainable.
Bipin Kumar Roy
Union of India
C. Hari Shankar
Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
