The petitioner withdrew the writ petition after availing appellate remedy; the court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, also disposing of the pending application.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~47
CNR No. DLHC010367122025
RAREX GLOBAL LLP .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ishita Farsaiya, Mr. Sparsh Bhargava, Ms. Vanshika Taneja, Mr. Aryan Singh, Ms. Siddhi Sharma, Advs.
versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 59.1 & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, SSC with Ms. Naincy Jain, Ms. Madhavi Shukla, JSCs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA O R D E R % 16.09.2026
DINESH MEHTA, J.
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
SEPTEMBER 16, 2026/ sid
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 11:44:51
RAREX GLOBAL LLP
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 59.1 & ORS.
Dinesh Mehta
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
