Writ petition against Income Tax Officer withdrawn by petitioner with permission of court; dismissed as withdrawn and pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
NAVYUG POLYSTOCK CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE .....Petitioner Through: Proxy Counsel, appearance not given.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 18-1, DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, SSC with Ms. Naincy JSC, Ms. Madhavi Shukla, JSC and Mr. Udit Dad, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
O R D E R % 23.07.2026
DINESH MEHTA, J.
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
JULY 23, 2026/ MR
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2026 at 11:56:44
Navyug Polystock Centre Private Limited through its authorized representative
Income Tax Officer, Ward 18-1, Delhi
Dinesh Mehta
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
