Ajay Kumar Gupta v. Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition (W.P.(C) 6553/2023) before Delhi High Court, decided 24.02.2026 by Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J. Petitioner Ajay Kumar Gupta alleged illegal transfer of Shed No. 47, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi in connivance with DSIIDC officials. Court declined to adjudicate merits owing to pending disputes between petitioner and his brother Pawan Kumar Gupta, including a complaint case; left it open to DSIIDC to examine any failure of Government officials to adhere to applicable rules and regulations; petition and pending applications, including impleadment application CM APPL. 12468/2026, disposed of with all questions left open. No statutes or precedents cited; no costs or quantum.
What did the court decide?
The Court declined to go into the merits of the petitioner's allegations concerning the transfer of Shed No. 47, in view of the pending disputes between the petitioner and his brother.