Jitin Garg Vs the Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

The Petitioner is a purchaser of land measuring 2 Bigha 8 Biswas out of Khasra No. 44//13 min, situated in the revenue estate of Village Kanjhawala, Delhi.

¶13

It is stated that the aforesaid land was purchased by the Petitioner from Mr. Rakesh Jain, being the recorded owner thereof, for valid sale consideration, and a Sale Deed dated 01^st December, 2025 was duly executed in favour of the Petitioner.

¶14

It is stated that the aforesaid Sale Deed was presented before Respondent No. 2, i.e., Sub-Registrar-VI D (Kanjhawala), for registration on 01^st December, 2025, and a receipt/slip bearing Serial No. 2025/14/21432 acknowledging presentation of the document was also issued on the same date. However, Respondent No. 2 has not proceeded to register the

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/05/2026 at 12:36:50

¶17

document on account of non-availability of a No Objection Certificate/Land Status Report [“ NOC/LSR ”], purportedly owing to pendency of consolidation proceedings in Village Kanjhawala. Aggrieved thereby, the Petitioner has approached this Court.

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents submits that since the land is under consolidation proceedings, any transfer would require NOC/LSR and verification from the competent authority.

¶19

Insofar as the insistence on an NOC/LSR founded on the pendency of consolidation proceedings is concerned, this Court in Okaya Infocom Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.¹ while dealing with the registration of sale deeds, held that having regard to the prolonged nature of consolidation proceedings, registration of such documents cannot be indefinitely withheld solely on the ground of non-availability of a sanction/NOC. The Sub-Registrar was directed to proceed in accordance with law, without insisting upon any sanction, approval, or NOC linked exclusively to consolidation proceedings.

¶20

The aforesaid legal position was reiterated by this Court in Jeevantika Organic Farming LLP v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.² , wherein, while taking note of the stand of the Government, this Court balanced equities by requiring the intending purchaser(s) therein to furnish an undertaking. The underlying principle, namely that registration cannot be stalled indefinitely on account of pending consolidation proceedings, is equally applicable to the present case.

¶21

In view of the aforesaid legal position, and having regard to the facts

¶22

1 In W.P.(C) 12122/2021 , decided on 10th November, 2023.

¶23

2 In W .P. (C) 12083/2025 & other connected matters decided on 12th August, 2025.

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/05/2026 at 12:36:50

¶26

of the present case, this Court is of the opinion that the writ petition can be disposed of by issuing directions in similar terms.

¶27

Accordingly, it is directed as under:

¶28

(i) The affidavit/undertaking already placed on record by the Petitioner is taken on record and accepted. The Petitioner shall remain bound by the same.

¶29

(ii) Any breach of the aforesaid undertaking shall entail consequences in accordance with law. The undertaking shall also form part of the Sale Deed so as to put any subsequent transferee to notice.

¶30

(iii) Subject to verification of the land acquisition status by the competent authority, and in line with the decisions in Okaya Infocom Pvt. Ltd. and Jeevantika Organic Farming LLP , it is directed that the registration of the Sale Deed shall not be refused solely on the ground of pendency of consolidation proceedings or non-availability of any NOC/LSR in that regard, and shall be processed further in accordance with law.

¶31

(iv) It is clarified that the registration shall be without prejudice to the pending consolidation proceedings and shall remain subject to the rights, claims, and contentions of third parties, if any.

¶32

With the foregoing directions, the petition is disposed of, along with the pending application.

¶33

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶34

MAY 12, 2026 nk

¶35

This is a digitally signed order.

¶36

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/05/2026 at 12:36:50

Jitin Garg v. the Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitin Garg v. the Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Delhi Msw Solutions Limited Vs the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Ors.

Mukesh Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Ms Highway Trans Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Gnct of Delhi Transport Department

Jagpal Singh Yadav Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Pramod Kumar Gupta Vs Union of India and Ors.

Mr Prashant Kadam Vs Union of India & Ors.

Angarai Natarajan Sethuraman Vs Directorate of Enforcement & Anr.

B.S.R. College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Shri Dilbagh Singh Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi through Its Commissioner & Anr.

Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Guru Harkishan Public School Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Jatin Garg Vs the Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Snap House LLP Vs the Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Savita Bansal Vs the Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.