Writ petition against the Commissioner of Customs was withdrawn because it rested on an affidavit sworn before a foreign country authority, making it incompetent. The court permitted withdrawal with liberty to file a proper petition and disposed of the pending application.
Petition permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file a proper petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
versus
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Mr. Iqbal Singh Bedi, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
O R D E R % 10.02.2026
NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J
AJAY DIGPAUL, J
FEBRUARY 10, 2026 /pr/st
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2026 at 11:19:16
Ms. Anna Wojtas
Commissioner of Customs
Nitin Wasudeo Sambre
Ajay Digpaul
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
