Petitioner sought direction to MCD to act against unauthorized construction at L-33, Laxmi Nagar. MCD reported no construction at that property, only at adjacent L-34, and petitioner did not show how he was affected. Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~47
KAPIL SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate (through VC)
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kunal Rawat and Ms. Ritu Gaur, Advocates for MCD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 24.04.2026
W.P.(C) 5572/2026
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 13:55:17
Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-110092, i.e. the property adjacent to the subject property.
AMIT BANSAL, J
APRIL 24, 2026
Vivek/-
W.P.(C) 5572/2026
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 13:55:17
1 issue framed by the court
Should MCD be directed to act against alleged unauthorized construction at the subject property?
Kapil Sharma
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
