Disposed¶20

Nukind Healthcare Private Limited v. Commissioner of Cgst, Delhi Malviya Nagar & Anr.

Delhi HC29 Apr 2026W.P.(C)/5505/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Nukind Healthcare Pvt Ltd v Commissioner of CGST Delhi Malviya Nagar; W.P.(C) 5505/2026; Delhi High Court; Order-in-Original 01/2022-23 dated 27.12.2023; Assistant Commissioner Division Malviya Nagar Delhi South Commissionerate; GST portal amount incongruity; rectification application 29.07.2025; hearing notice 23.04.2026; decide before 15.05.2026; no coercive recovery action; writ of certiorari; reversal Rs. 41,02,952/-; writ petition disposed; Monica Benjamin SSC.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no.2 to consider and decide the petitioner's rectification application in accordance with law, preferably before 15.05.2026; restraint on initiation of coercive action by respondents until the rectification application is decided. ¶20

Nukind Healthcare Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Cgst, Delhi Malviya Nagar & Anr. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~92

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 5505/2026 & CM APPL. 26990/2026

¶4

NUKIND HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Nitin Aggrawal, Mr. Dhananjay Singh, Mr. Sourabh Soni, Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr. Kavesh Bidhuri, Mr. Bharat Panchan, Mr. Shobit Anand, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

COMMISSIONER OF CGST, DELHI MALVIYA NAGAR & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Monica Benjamin, SSC.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR

¶9

O R D E R % 29.04.2026

¶10

The instant writ petition has been prayed seeking following reliefs:

¶11

“a) Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the Order-in-Original No. 01/2022-23 dated 27.12.2023, passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Division - Malviya Nagar, Delhi South Commissionerate;

¶12

b) Direct the Respondent to reconsider the Petitioner's submissions and pass a fresh order after verifying the reversal of Rs. 41,02,952/- and the reconciliations submitted; c) Stay the recovery proceedings initiated pursuant to the impugned order, during the pendency of the present petition”

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that inspite of the fact that there is an apparent incongruity in the amount which has been reflected on the GST portal and the order which has been passed by the respondent

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 12:51:20

¶16

no.2-Assistant Commissioner, Malviya Nagar, CGST and though this fact has been brought to the notice of respondent no. 2 by the petitioner by moving a rectification application dated 29.07.2025 in relation to the order dated 29.12.2023, neither the respondent have decided the petitioner’s rectification application nor have they carried out the requisite correction(s) on the GST portal.

¶17

Ms. Monica Benjamin, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents, at the outset submitted that the petitioner had been issued a notice of hearing dated 23.04.2026 and its rectification application is scheduled to be heard on 30.04.2026.

¶18

In view of the submissions so made, we dispose of the present writ petition with a direction to the respondent no.2 to consider and decide petitioner's rectification application in accordance with law, preferably before 15.05.2026.

¶19

Since the respondents have so far not taken any measure for recovery pursuant to the order dated 27.12.2023, they shall not initiate any coercive action until the rectification application is decided.

¶20

The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. The pending application also stands disposed of.

¶21

DINESH MEHTA, J.

¶22

VINOD KUMAR, J.

¶23

APRIL 29, 2026/ nk

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 12:51:20

Nukind Healthcare Private Limited v. Commissioner of Cgst, Delhi Malviya Nagar & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nukind Healthcare Private Limited v. Commissioner of Cgst, Delhi Malviya Nagar & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akhilesh Kumar Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Deenbandhu Malik Vs Union of India and Ors.

Vineet Kumar Chaudhary Vs State Bank of India

Green Fortune Communications Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 30 Delhi & Ors.

Sh. Robin Aggarwal Vs Smt. Vidya

Ali Ahmed Khan Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ariam Chatterjee Vs Union of India & Anr.

Vipan Singh Wazir Vs Oriental Bank of Commerce & Anr.

Green Fortune Communications Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 30 Delhi & Ors.

Wanshan Mobiles Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 30 Delhi & Ors.

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -10 Vs Dabur Invest Corp.

M/S Swikriti Travels Vs M/S Mini Pocket Opc Pvt. Ltd.

Vishal Malik Vs High Court of Delhi through Registrar General

Jmc Infratech Private Limited Vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax / Assessment Unit (Nfac) & Anr.