Disposed¶11

Ms Mittal Wire Company & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi HC5 Jan 2026W.P.(C)/5245/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court writ withdrawal order dated 05.01.2026; Quest Infotech Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Mittal Wire Company v. Union of India; petitions disposed of as withdrawn with liberty for statutory appeal under CGST Act; limitation protection for time spent pursuing writs; merits not considered; CBIC senior standing counsel for respondents; no precedent engaged.

What did the court decide?

Both writ petitions disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to prefer statutory appeal under the CGST Act; if limitation becomes an issue, time spent in pursuing the writ petitions to be reckoned towards limitation; pending applications disposed of. ¶11

Ms Mittal Wire Company & Anr. Vs Union of India & Anr. — GST and Indirect Tax | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~1 & 2

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 4392/2025 & CM APPL. 20281/2025

¶4

QUEST INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Aditya Kumar, Mr. Suresh Chaudhary, Mr. Gagan Kumar Singhal, Ms. Ila Nath, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arjun Malik, Senior Standing Counsel (CBIC) for R-2 and R-3 2 + W.P.(C) 5245/2025 & CM APPL. 23850/2025 MS MITTAL WIRE COMPANY & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Aditya Kumar, Mr. Suresh Chaudhary, Mr. Gagan Kumar Singhal, Ms. Ila Nath, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Mr. Jatin Gaur, Advocates

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL

¶6

O R D E R % 05.01.2026

¶7

The counsel for petitioners, on instructions, has made a motion for withdrawal of the present writ petitions with liberty to take recourse to the

¶8

This is a digitally signed order.

¶9

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/01/2026 at 12:12:29

¶10

appellate remedy under the provisions of Central Goods and Services Tax Act (‘ CGST Act ’).

¶11

The writ petitions, as such, stand disposed of as withdrawn. The petitioners are at liberty to prefer statutory appeal as provided under the CGST Act.

¶12

In case if the issue of limitation crops up, time spent by the petitioners in pursuing the present writ petitions be taken into account and accordingly, the limitation be reckoned.

¶13

Needless to clarify that this Court has not gone into the merits of the matter.

¶14

Pending applications also stands disposed of.

¶15

NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J

¶16

AJAY DIGPAUL, J

¶17

JANUARY 5, 2026 /pr/st

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/01/2026 at 12:12:29

Ms Mittal Wire Company & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ms Mittal Wire Company & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sgnco Green Resources Ltd. Vs Directorate General of Foreign Trade

Suhana K N Vs National Testing Agency & Ors.

Sharp Tanks and Structural Private Limited Vs Union of India and Ors.

Professor Alka Acharya Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors. & Ors.

Kuhasini Gnanaseggaran Vs Union of India & Ors.

Deepak Miglani Vs Regional Passport Officer (Rpo) & Ors.

Anjali Vs Union of India & Ors.

Sanjeev Tripathi & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Frahat Shabnam Vs the Additional Commissioner of Customs & Anr.

Guley Zehra Zaidi Vs Commissioner of Customs

Mohd Musadique Siddiqui Vs Commissioner of Customs