Writ petition withdrawn by the petitioner in view of a jurisdiction objection, with liberty granted to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
NIRAJ KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Laxmi Gupta, Mr. Vivek Kumar Gupta and Ms. Pooja Giri, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Radhika Bishwaji Dubey, CGSC with Ms. Gurleen Kaur Waraich, Mr. Kritarth Upadhyay and Mr. Amulya Mishra, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 28.04.2026
SANJEEV NARULA, J
APRIL 28, 2026/ hc
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2026 at 13:20:11
Niraj Kumar
Union of India & Ors.
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
