The court disposed of a writ petition challenging a customs confiscation order, noting that an appeal against the order was already pending before the Appellate Authority. The parties were directed to pursue the pending appeal.
Writ petition disposed of; parties directed to pursue pending appeal before the Appellate Authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
CNR No. DLHC010143572026
versus
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Avijit Dikshit, Standing Counsel alongside Ms. Monika Verma, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN
O R D E R % 16.09.2026
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
SHAIL JAIN, J.
SEPTEMBER 16, 2026/PT/ MM
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 11:37:35
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be entertained when an appeal against the confiscation order is pending before the Appellate Authority.
Subha Singh
Commissioner of Customs
Anil Kshetarpal
Shail Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
