Shivansh Tyagi v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC2 Apr 2026W.P.(C)/4273/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Shivansh Tyagi v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors; W.P.(C) 4273/2026; High Court of Delhi; single-judge bench (Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J.); decided 02.04.2026; Mukhyamantri Khel Protsahan Yojana; sports cash incentive Scheme; 38th National Games Uttarakhand 2025; Taekwondo 80 kg category; Gold Medal; inclusion as eligible athlete; pending representation to be decided within 3 months; GNCTD; petition disposed of; exemption application allowed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no.2 to deal with the petitioner's pending representation with due expedition within three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. ¶¶24

Shivansh Tyagi Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~47

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 4273/2026

¶4

SHIVANSH TYAGI

¶5

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Tyagi, Mr. Anil Ahluwalia, Mr. Sagar, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

¶8

.....Respondent Through: Mr. Counsel for R-1 and 2/ GNCTD ( appearance not given ). Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, CGSC, Ms. Sonali Modi, Adv. , Mr. Mukul Dev, Advocates for R-4.

¶9

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 02.04.2026

¶10

CM APPL. 20801/2026 (EXEMPTION)

¶11

Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

Application stands disposed of.

¶13

W.P.(C) 4273/2026

¶14

The petition has been filed seeking the direction to the respondent no.1 and 2 to include the petitioner as an eligible athlete under the Scheme Mukhyamantri Khel Protsahan Yojana. This Scheme seems to have been framed for sport persons who achieved Gold Medal at the 38^th National Games, Uttarakhand 2025.

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 13:17:39

¶17

The petitioner claims to be a Taekwondo Athlete who has represented Delhi under the 80 kg category at the 38th National Games, Uttarakhand 2025. The petitioner claims to have secured a Gold Medal.

¶18

Under the aforesaid Scheme, the petitioner claims to be entitled for cash incentives. The petitioner, therefore, made representations before the respondents. However, on account of inaction by the respondents, she has approached this Court.

¶19

Issue notice.

¶20

Learned counsel for respondent no.1 and 2 and learned counsel for respondent no.4, appear and accept notice.

¶21

Keeping in mind the short controversy, the Court finds that the petition itself can be disposed of issuing the directions to respondent no.2 to deal with the petitioner’s pending representation with due expedition within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order passed today.

¶22

Let a copy of the petition along with this order be sent to respondent no.2 by learned counsel who represents the said respondent.

¶23

Let an appropriate order be passed by the concerned authority, within the time stipulated above.

¶24

With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of.

¶25

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J

¶26

APRIL 2, 2026 aks

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 13:17:39

Shivansh Tyagi v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivansh Tyagi v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Gian Prakash Vs Union of India and Ors.

Shri B R Patel Ptc College Smt Sa Patel Mahila B Ed College & Anr. Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Aarush Jain Vs National Testing Agency and Anr.

Major Sangeeta Vs Union of India & Ors.

Naveen Kumar Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Muzassim Vs Unique Identification Authority of India

Kaushalendra Kumar Singh Vs Union of India & Anr.

Shashi Kumar Choudhary Vs Joint Commissioner, Cgst Appeals Ii, Delhi

Churchill Brother Sports Club Pvt. Ltd. Vs All India Football Federation Aiff & Ors.

M/S Saravjeet Enterprises Vs Union of India & Ors.

Pooja Gupta Vs Union of India & Anr.

Ram Kripal Singh Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Col Raghuraj Singh Retd Vs Union of India & Ors.

Rajiv Kumar Ray Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.