Kuldeep Singh Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Kuldeep Singh Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Direction that MCD inspect all the subject properties within two weeks and thereafter take appropriate action, if so warranted, in accordance with law; petitioner left at liberty to pursue further remedies; owners'/occupiers' rights, contentions and legal remedies protected.

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents should be directed to take action, in accordance with law, on the petitioner's complaint dated 13 January 2026 regarding unauthorized construction at the buildings detailed in the writ petition ('subject properties').

Court's answer

The Court directed that inspection of all the subject properties shall be carried out within two weeks from the date of the order, and thereafter appropriate action, if so warranted, shall be taken in accordance with law.

Ratio / Principle

In view of MCD's undertaking to inspect and act and the Court's inspection direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Key takeaways

In the event of any further grievance with regard to unauthorised construction, the petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate remedies in accordance with law.obiter¶30
All rights, contentions and legal remedies of the owners/occupiers of the subject properties shall remain protected.obiter¶31

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Delhi High Court (Amit Bansal, J) disposed of W.P.(C) 3405/2026 (Kuldeep Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.), in which the petitioner sought a direction to act on his complaint dated 13 January 2026 against unauthorized construction at buildings detailed in paragraph 2.3 of the petition ('subject properties'); the petitioner resides in the same locality. Counsel for respondent no.2/STF stated the complaint had been registered and marked to respondent no.1/MCD for appropriate action and remained unclosed; counsel for MCD undertook to inspect the subject properties and take appropriate action in accordance with law. The Court directed that inspection be carried out within two weeks and appropriate action, if warranted, follow in accordance with law, and disposed of the petition, reserving the petitioner's liberty to pursue further remedies and protecting the rights, contentions and legal remedies of the owners/occupiers of the subject properties. No statute or precedent was cited and no monetary quantum arises.

$~75

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

- W.P.(C) 3405/2026

KULDEEP SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.P. Rana & Mr. Bhuvan Tomr, Advocates.

versus

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents

Through: Mr. Kapil Dutta, Standing Counsel for MCD. Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Standing Counsel for STF with Mr. Aditya Verma, Advocate. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel for Delhi Police.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

O R D E R

%

17.03.2026

The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to take action on the complaint of the petitioner dated 13^th January, 2026, in accordance with law, against unauthorized construction as detailed in the said complaint.

In paragraph no. 2.3 of the writ petition, the petitioner has provided the details of the buildings, where unauthorized construction has been carried out. The details of the buildings are set out below:

Page 1 of 3

W.P.(C) 3405/2026

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/03/2026 at 13:41:58

(hereinafter referred to as ‘subject properties’)

It is stated that the petitioner resides in the same locality.

Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 2/STF, submits that the complaint of the petitioner has been registered

Page 2 of 3

W.P.(C) 3405/2026

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/03/2026 at 13:41:58

and marked to the respondent no.1/MCD for appropriate action.

4.1. It is further submitted that the complaint has not been closed yet.

Mr. Kapil Dutta, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.1/MCD, submits that MCD shall inspect all the subject properties in question and take appropriate action in accordance with law.

The inspection shall be carried out within two (2) weeks from today, and thereafter appropriate action, if so warranted, shall be taken in accordance with law.

In view of the above, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

In the event the petitioner has any further grievance with regard to unauthorised construction, he is at liberty to take appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

All rights, contentions and legal remedies of the owners/occupiers of the subject properties shall remain protected.

AMIT BANSAL, J

MARCH 17, 2026

at

Page 3 of 3

W.P.(C) 3405/2026

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/03/2026 at 13:41:58