Jatin Bhola and Ors. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

¶1

$~51

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 16382/2022, CM APPL. 51455/2022,

¶4

CM APPL. 51456/2022 and CM APPL. 57439/2023

¶5

ANURAG AHUJA AND ORS .....Petitioners

¶6

Through: Ms.Meghna De and Mr.Siddharth Sapra, Advocates versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Avnish Ahlawat Standing Counsel GNCTD Mr.Shivnath Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr.Rishabh Sahu, SPC with Mr.Sameer Sharma, Advocates for UOI

¶7

53

¶8

- W.P.(C) 16477/2022, CM APPL. 51741/2022 and CM APPL. 53850/2023

¶9

SH SUSHIL KUMAR AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Ms.Meghna De and Mr.Siddharth Sapra, Advocates versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Avnish Ahlawat Standing Counsel GNCTD Mr.Shivnath Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2

¶10

55

¶11

- W.P.(C) 16511/2022 and CM APPL. 51888/2022

¶12

SMT POOJA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms.Meghna De and Mr.Siddharth Sapra, Advocates

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/03/2026 at 17:21:49

¶15

versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Avnish Ahlawat Standing Counsel GNCTD Mr.Shivnath Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2

¶16

58

¶17

- W.P.(C) 16804/2022 and CM APPL. 53105/2022

¶18

SH AJAY KUMAR AND ANR .....Petitioners

¶19

Through: Ms.Meghna De and Mr.Siddharth Sapra, Advocates

¶20

versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Avnish Ahlawat Standing Counsel GNCTD Mr.Shivnath Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr.Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, SPC with Mr.Suramya Srivastava, Advocate for UOI

¶21

59

¶22

- W.P.(C) 16810/2022, CM APPL. 53119/2022,

¶23

CM APPL. 34235/2023 and CM APPL. 62493/2023

¶24

SMT GEETA BISHT AND ANR .....Petitioners

¶25

Through: Ms.Meghna De and Mr.Siddharth Sapra, Advocates

¶26

versus

¶27

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Avnish Ahlawat Standing Counsel GNCTD Mr.Shivnath Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2 Ms.Shubhra Parashar and Mr.Virender Pratap Singh, Advocates

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/03/2026 at 17:21:49

¶30

63

¶31

- W.P.(C) 2175/2023, CM APPL. 8270/2023 and

¶32

CM APPL. 5862/2024

¶33

SH LALIT GAUR AND ORS .....Petitioners

¶34

Through: Ms.Meghna De and Mr.Siddharth Sapra, Advocates

¶35

versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Avnish Ahlawat Standing Counsel GNCTD Mr.Shivnath Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2

¶36

Mr.Vijay Joshi, Advocate for UOI

¶37

69

¶38

- W.P.(C) 3119/2024 and CM APPL. 12794/2024

¶39

JATIN BHOLA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms.Meghna De and Mr.Siddharth Sapra, Advocates

¶40

versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Avnish Ahlawat Standing Counsel GNCTD Mr.Shivnath Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2

¶41

CORAM:

¶42

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

¶43

O R D E R % 10.03.2026

¶44

By way of the present writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek directions to the respondents to comply with the direction/notice issued by the Union of India through the

¶45

This is a digitally signed order.

¶46

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/03/2026 at 17:21:49

¶47

Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Ministry of Labour and Employment vide which the respondent was advised not to change the service condition of the workmen or terminate their services during the pendency of the dispute.

¶48

The petitioners further impugned the Office Order dated 22.11.2022 issued by the Revenue Department, GNCTD vide which it was directed that all the Data Entry Operators (DEOs), who had previously worked in SubRegistrar Offices in Delhi, be surrendered and immediately replaced. 3. On petitions being filed, this Court, vide order dated 13.12.2022 had directed that the respondents shall maintain status quo the services of the petitioners as existing on that date. 4. Notably, the present petitions have been filed in the context of industrial disputes raised by the petitioners/workmen, who have claimed that they were engaged in the capacity of Data Entry Operators(DEOs) working in the establishment of Deputy Commissioner/District Magistrate, in different districts, Government of NCT of Delhi shown as outsourced workers on the basis of contract entered into between the Govt. of NCT of Delhi and the Contractor(s). It is claimed that the duties performed by the DEOs are of perennial and continuous in nature and the workers have been working against sanctioned vacant posts of LDC/UDC. It is further claimed that though the workmen are working under the direct and complete supervision of Management No.1, they are shown as the employees engaged through the contractor.

¶49

Being aggrieved with the non-regularization of their services and denial of proper pay scale, allowances, difference of salaries paid and salary of proper pay-scale of DEO, LDC/UDC on the principle of equal pay for

¶50

This is a digitally signed order.

¶51

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/03/2026 at 17:21:49

¶52

equal work, the petitioners approached the Conciliation Officer seeking regularization of their services along with the benefits as per pay-scale of DEO, LDC/UDC posts.

¶53

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in some cases, respondent no.1’s contract with respondent no.2/Contractor(s) has expired and a new Contractor has been engaged. The petitioners have approached this Court apprehending termination of their services by the respondents. 7. Pertinently, writ petitions were filed at the stage when conciliation proceedings were pending and an order directing the respondents not to change the service conditions as well as not to terminate their services during pendency of the dispute was already passed. Concededly, thereafter the matter is now stated to be pending before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT).

¶54

A gainful reference is made to the decision of the Supreme Court in Shripal and Anr. Vs. Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad, reported as (2025) SCC OnLine SC 221 , wherein while taking note of Section 6E of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which is pari materia to Section 33 of the Act, it was held that unilateral alteration in service conditions, including termination, is impermissible during the pendency of an industrial dispute unless prior approval is obtained from the appropriate authority.

¶55

Learned counsel for respondent no.1 submits that the petitioners were deployed through respondent no.2 and, with the passage of time, a new Contractor has been engaged in some of the districts. He, on instructions, submits that the service conditions of the petitioners will not be altered during the pendency of the dispute before the CGIT.

¶56

Considering that the dispute already stands referred and is pending

¶57

This is a digitally signed order.

¶58

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/03/2026 at 17:21:49

¶59

before the CGIT, the present petitions are disposed of along with pending applications with a direction that respondent no.2 would not alter the service conditions during the pendency of the dispute and with further direction that during the term of their engagement, the wages be paid regularly and arrears, if any, be also cleared within a period of one month from today. 11. The aforesaid directions shall remain operative subject to the outcome of the proceedings pending before the concerned CGIT.

¶60

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MARCH 10, 2026 / pmc

¶61

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/03/2026 at 17:21:49

Jatin Bhola and Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jatin Bhola and Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vaibhav Chauhan Vs Union of India & Ors.

Raj Kumar Sharma and Ors. Vs Union of India through Ministry of Commerce and Industry and Ors.

Gaurav Dutt Sharma Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

M/S Heeric Vs Rbl Bank & Ors.

Nav Rashtra Party Vs Election Commission of India

Mohd. Suleman Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi

M/S Braham Construction Co. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Resident Welfare Association Vs Municipal Corporation Delhi and Anr.

Gurdhyan Bhola and Anr. Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Sangeeta Rawat & Ors.

M/S Ttk Healthcare Limited Vs Sharad Tandon and Anr.

Raj Kumar Sharma and Ors. Vs Shri Santosh Kumar Rai and Ors.

Sh. Mohd Rahees Vs Union of India

Sh Sushil Kumar and Anr. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.