Vinod Saini Vs Registrar of Companies and Ors.

$~3 to 9

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

W.P.(C) 3087/2022 & CM APPL. 49134/2023 VINOD SAINI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Aman Kumar and Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocates.

	versus
	REGISTRAR OF COMPANI	ES AND ORS.	.....Respon	dents
4	Through:	Mr. Farman A Jamnal and Ms. Mr. Deep Bisht	li CGSC, M Tanya, Advs , Advocate for	s. Usha for R-1. R-3.
+	W.P.(C) 3094/2022
	ANKIT SHRIVASTAVA		.....Petition	er
	Through:	Mr. Rakesh	Kumar, Mr.	Aman
	versus	Kumar and Advocates.	Mr. Ankit	Kumar,
	REGISTRAR OF COMPANI	ES AND ORS.	.....Respon	dents
	Through:	Mr. Vikrant Satvika Goyal, Mr. Inderpreet Mr. Deep Bisht	Nilesh Goy Mr. Yash Bas Singh, Advs. f , Advocate for	al, Ms. oya and or R-1. R-3.
5
+	W.P.(C) 3095/2022 & CM AP	PL. 48729/2023
	GAURAV JAIN		.....Petition	er
	Through:	Mr. Rakesh	Kumar, Mr.	Aman

¶5

This is a digitally signed order.

¶6

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/05/2026 at 12:26:49

¶7

Kumar and Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocates.

¶8

versus

¶9

REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Farman Ali CGSC, Ms. Usha Jamnal and Ms. Tanya, Advs for R-1. Mr. Anuj Tiwari with Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Deep Bisht, Advocate for R-3.

¶10

6

¶11

W.P.(C) 3102/2022 & CM APPL. 49142/2023 VINOD KUMAR CHOUDHARY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Aman Kumar and Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocates.

¶12

versus

¶13

REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Farman Ali CGSC, Ms. Usha Jamnal and Ms. Tanya, Advs. Mr. Vikrant Nilesh Goyal, Ms. Satvika Goyal, Mr. Yash Basoya and Mr. Inderpreet Singh, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Deep Bisht, Advocate for R-3.

¶14

7

¶15

- W.P.(C) 3103/2022 & CM APPL. 48730/2023

¶16

BHUVNESH KUMAR		...	..Petition	er
Through:	Mr. Rakesh	Kum	ar, Mr.	Aman
	Kumar and Advocates.	Mr.	Ankit	Kumar,

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/05/2026 at 12:26:49

¶19

versus

¶20

REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Farman Ali CGSC, Ms. Usha Jamnal and Ms. Tanya, Advs for R-1. Mr. Deep Bisht, Advocate for R-3.

¶21

8

¶22

+ W.P.(C) 3157/2022 & CM APPL. 49137/2023

¶23

UDAY KUMAR			.....Petition	er
	Through:	Mr. Rakesh Kumar and Advocates.	Kumar, Mr. Mr. Ankit	Aman Kumar,
	versus
REGISTRAR OF	COMPANI Through:	ES AND ORS. Mr. Deep Bish	.....Respon t, Advocate for	dents R-3.
9

¶24

W.P.(C) 3192/2022 & CM APPL. 49133/2023

¶25

MOHAN			.....Petition	er
Through: versus	Mr. Kum Adv	Rakesh ar and ocates.	Kumar, Mr. Mr. Ankit	Aman Kumar,
REGISTRAR OF COMPANI	ES AN	D ORS.	.....Respon	dents
Through:	Mr. Satv Mr.	Vikrant ika Goyal, Inderpreet	Nilesh Goy Mr. Yash Bas Singh, Advs. f	al, Ms. oya and or R-1.

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/05/2026 at 12:26:49

¶28

Mr. Deep Bisht, Advocate for R-3.

¶29

CORAM:

¶30

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

¶31

O R D E R

¶32

% 22.05.2026

¶33

There are seven writ petitions. Out of them, in four writ petitions, the names of the companies have already been struck off from the Registrar of Companies [ RoC ].

¶34

The petitioners, who were the erstwhile Director, are claiming for acceptance of their resignation. However, in three writ petitions, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [ CIRP ] proceedings are going on. The request in all these writ petitions is to direct the respondents to accept the petitioners’ resignation as a Director.

¶35

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has placed reliance on the order dated 13.09.2018 in W.P.(C) 2448/2018 ( Annexure P-11 ). He, thus, contends that in almost similar circumstances, the Court has accepted the prayer for removal of their names from the record of the RoC.

¶36

Having considered the controversy involved in the writ petitions and bearing in mind the order dated 13.09.2018, the Court deems it appropriate to direct the RoC to decide the petitioners’ request with respect to four writ petitions within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order passed today, where the names of the companies have already been struck off.

¶37

With respect to three writ petitions, where the CIRP proceedings are going on, let the RoC to also call upon the Resolution Professional [ RP ] and depending upon the submissions to be made by the RP, and respect to the

¶38

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/05/2026 at 12:26:49

¶39

petitions, let a decision be taken within the same period.

¶40

If the grievance of the petitioner is not fully mitigated, he shall be at liberty to take further recourse in accordance with law.

¶41

Petitions stand disposed of.

¶42

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J

¶43

MAY 22, 2026/P

¶44

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/05/2026 at 12:26:49

Vinod Saini v. Registrar of Companies and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Saini v. Registrar of Companies and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Islamuddin Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi through Chief Secretary & Ors.

Ashwani Kumar Pandey Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ashrit Talwar Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Smt Sheela Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Bhuthalingam Hariharan Vs Bureau of Immigration

Molvi Anzar Vs National Testing Agency & Ors.

Ms. Aarti Mathur & Anr. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Smt. Shiksha Jain Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Jasmine Jangra (Minor, through Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Smt. Renu Sharma) Vs Union of India & Anr.

Kailash Chand Sondhi Vs National Cyber Crime Co-Ordination Center & Ors.

Syed Fayazuddin and Anr. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Ms Taurant Projects Ltd. Vs Gail India Ltd.

Keshaw Anand Vs Union of India & Ors.

Aryan Pumps and Enviro Solutions Private Limited Vs Airports Authority of India