Writ petition concerning GST authorities was sought to be withdrawn by the petitioner on instructions. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting liberty to pursue remedies available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
M/S HIPHONIC PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shivender Kumar Sharma, Mr. Kushagra Azad, Mr. Urooj Chaudhary and Ms. Esha Sharma, Advs.
versus THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, GST DELHI-EAST & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay K Chadha, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Asad Quraishi, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL O R D E R
NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J
AJAY DIGPAUL, J
MAY 6, 2026/DM/ST
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/05/2026 at 12:45:49
M/S HipHonic Private Limited
The Principal Commissioner, GST Delhi-East & Ors.
Nitin Wasudeo Sambre
Ajay Digpaul
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
