Law students sought supplementary examination, section allotment and declaration of results from the University of Delhi. Counsel for the university undertook that consequential benefits would follow as attendance is no longer a criterion; the court bound respondents to the statement and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~151
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Umesh Kumar, Mr. Shantanu Sagar, Mr. Abhishek Kumar Gond, Mr. Boby Deval Kumar, Mohd Atif, Advs.
versus
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS.
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Mohinder JS Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Ms. Aishwarya Malhotra, Ms. Tripta Sharma Advs for R1 Mr Preet Pal Singh, Ms. Tanupreet Kaur, Ms. Pooja, Ms. Simran, Ms. Medha Sharma, Mr. Gaurav, Advs. for R6
%
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R 09.03.2026
CM APPL. 13976/2026
Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 2866/2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2026 at 13:45:55
2. Direct the Respondent No. 1, 2 & 5 to forthwith allocate appropriate sections to Petitioner No. 2 & 3 in the IVth and VIth semester respectively without any further delay, so as to enable them to attend classes and continue their academic pursuits, in the interest of justice.
3. Direct the Respondent No. 1, 2, 4 & 5 to forthwith declare the result of the Petitioners without any further delay, so as to enable them to attend classes and continue their academic pursuits, in the interest of justice.
4. Allow the Petitioners to get all consequential benefits including release of Results, conduct Supplementary exam, promotion and section allotment.”
JASMEET SINGH, J
MARCH 9, 2026 / (MS)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2026 at 13:45:55
1 issue framed by the court
Should the respondents be directed to conduct a supplementary exam, allocate sections, and declare results of the petitioners with consequential benefits?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Suicide Committed by Sushant Rohilla, Law Student of I.P. University, In reRelied on¶2
2025 SCC OnLine Del 7920 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Alfisha Arif
University of Delhi
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
