Writ petition before the Delhi High Court was dismissed as withdrawn after counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw it. The court made no substantive adjudication on the subject matter of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
RAMYASH PANDEY
.....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Amita Saxena, Mr. Amitanshu Satyarthi, Ms. Archisha Satyarthi, Advs.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS.
.....Respondent
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R D E R % 16.04.2026
JASMEET SINGH, J
APRIL 16, 2026/sp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 14:09:41
Ramyash Pandey
Delhi Development Authority
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
