Delhi High Court; W.P.(C) 2340/2026; Deepak Traders v. Commissioner of CGST, Delhi & Ors; decided 18 February 2026; coram Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Ajay Digpaul JJ.; alternate remedy of appeal; refusal to interfere in extraordinary jurisdiction; petition disposed of with liberty.
Petition disposed of with liberty. ¶12
The Court found no reason to cause interference in its extraordinary jurisdiction because the petitioner has an alternate remedy of preferring an appeal. ¶11
$~78
DEEPAK TRADERS .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Khursheed Ahmad, Mr. Mohammad Kamil, Ms. Shahin & Ms. Deepika, Advs.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF CGST, DELHI & ORS ......Respondents Through: Mr. Akash Verma, SSC with Ms. Aanchal Uppal, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
O R D E R
% 18.02.2026
NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J
AJAY DIGPAUL, J
FEBRUARY 18, 2026/ sky/ok
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/02/2026 at 12:11:18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should interfere in its extraordinary jurisdiction where the petitioner has an alternate remedy of preferring an appeal.medium confidence¶11
The Court found no reason to cause interference in its extraordinary jurisdiction because the petitioner has an alternate remedy of preferring an appeal.ratio¶11
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
