A 2005 writ petition challenged an advertisement prescribing an IDA pay scale for the post of Chairman-cum-Managing Director and sought a direction to call the petitioner for interview. The court found the relief claimed had become infructuous and disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
DR. N.EMAYAVARAMBAN .....Petitioner
UOI & ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yashvardhan, Advocate and Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 02.05.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/05/2026 at 12:15:09
infructuous and it is accordingly disposed of.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MAY 2, 2026/RS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/05/2026 at 12:15:09
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the 2005 advertisement for Chairman-cum-Managing Director selection survives, given the interview has already been held?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. N.Emayavaramban
UOI
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
